What are the most promising research studies on cancer's cure?

AI Thread Summary
Promising cancer research often shows initial success in animal models, particularly mice, but many of these studies do not translate to effective treatments in humans. Each type of cancer is unique and responds differently to treatments, complicating the development of universal therapies. For instance, lung cancer has distinct types that require tailored approaches. While some studies aimed at enhancing the immune system's ability to target cancer cells have shown potential, they have not consistently yielded successful outcomes. Current trends in research focus on personalizing treatment based on genetic mutations of tumors. Preventive measures, such as anti-smoking policies and vaccines like the HPV vaccine, are also highlighted as effective strategies in reducing cancer incidence. Overall, while there are numerous studies that initially appear promising, many have ultimately failed in human trials, underscoring the complexity of cancer treatment.
Tosh5457
Messages
130
Reaction score
28
Every now and then, a news appears saying a new research could revert cancer on mice or something similar. But then I don't hear about them anymore. So what are the most promising research studies on curing cancer, and were there any promising researches before that failed when tested on humans?
 
Biology news on Phys.org
Tosh5457 said:
Every now and then, a news appears saying a new research could revert cancer on mice or something similar. But then I don't hear about them anymore. So what are the most promising research studies on curing cancer, and were there any promising researches before that failed when tested on humans?
The problem is that each cancer is different and responds to different treatments. What might work for one type won't work for another. Take lung cancer for example, there are two types and they are treated differently.

Yes, there have been treatments that initially looked promising that failed. Too many to go into. Your questions are much too broad.
 
Studies that wanted to trigger the immune system to recognize cancer cells were promising, but haven't received too much success. Now people are focussing on characterizing tumors based on their mutated genes and personalizing medicine based on that.
 
Perhaps some of the most effective "treatments" are the interventions that prevent the cancers from occurring in the first place. For example, public policy discouraging smoking has greatly reduced the incidence of lung cancer and the HPV vaccine will likely reduce the incidence of cervical cancer in the future.
 
The problem is that each cancer is different and responds to different treatments. What might work for one type won't work for another. Take lung cancer for example, there are two types and they are treated differently.

Nonetheless they all have some characteristics in common.

Evo said:
The problem is that each cancer is different and responds to different treatments. What might work for one type won't work for another. Take lung cancer for example, there are two types and they are treated differently.

Yes, there have been treatments that initially looked promising that failed. Too many to go into. Your questions are much too broad.

What do you mean by "initially looked promising"? Where they successful on mice, or just in vitro? I realize I may be very naive, but I'm actually very much ignorant about this subject.

Here are some of the examples I'm speaking about, all successfully tested on mice:
http://munews.missouri.edu/news-rel...tment-has-no-side-effects-says-mu-researcher/
http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2008/06/080628155300.htm
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/science/science-news/9915393/Mice-cured-of-lung-cancer-with-gene-therapy.html
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Deadly cattle screwworm parasite found in US patient. What to know. https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/health/2025/08/25/new-world-screwworm-human-case/85813010007/ Exclusive: U.S. confirms nation's first travel-associated human screwworm case connected to Central American outbreak https://www.reuters.com/business/environment/us-confirms-nations-first-travel-associated-human-screwworm-case-connected-2025-08-25/...
Chagas disease, long considered only a threat abroad, is established in California and the Southern U.S. According to articles in the Los Angeles Times, "Chagas disease, long considered only a threat abroad, is established in California and the Southern U.S.", and "Kissing bugs bring deadly disease to California". LA Times requires a subscription. Related article -...
I am reading Nicholas Wade's book A Troublesome Inheritance. Please let's not make this thread a critique about the merits or demerits of the book. This thread is my attempt to understanding the evidence that Natural Selection in the human genome was recent and regional. On Page 103 of A Troublesome Inheritance, Wade writes the following: "The regional nature of selection was first made evident in a genomewide scan undertaken by Jonathan Pritchard, a population geneticist at the...
Back
Top