What Are the Possible Wavelengths of the Second Light in a Two-Slit Experiment?

  • Thread starter Thread starter mneox
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Interference
mneox
Messages
35
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Suppose I have two different visible lights of different wavelengths passing through in a two-slit interference experiment. What appears on the screen is mostly a mixture of the two colours. However, one of the bright fringes, say m=2 is purely 1 of the colours (this light has say, 300 micrometers in wavelength), and none of the other.

What are the possible wavelengths of the second visible light?

Homework Equations



y = (R)(m)(lambda)/(d)
dsin(theta) = m(lambda)

The Attempt at a Solution



How do I figure this out? If none of the second colour appeared, it would mean that somehow there was interference and therefore only the first colour showed? How would I find the wavelengths of the second colour though.

Sorry I can't really give a better attempt or answer, I'm just so lost on this that it's discouraging. Thanks for your help/explanations in advance.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
See, for a mixture of colours to appear, both the colours can never undergo destructive interference as in that case there would be zero intensity(ideally) at the point where it happens.Now a bright fringe will have one color only if the light ray having the other color undergoes destructive interference at that point. So now you can apply the condition for destructive interference of the light of second wavelength and find it out.But of course before that you will have to find the distance of the point from the central maximum by using the values given for the light of 300 micro meter wavelength
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top