Schools What are the requirements for grad school in physics?

AI Thread Summary
To gain admission to graduate schools for physics, a strong GPA is crucial, with a minimum of 3.0 often required, though higher GPAs are preferred for competitive programs. Research experience is highly valued, as it demonstrates the ability to conduct original work; however, it's acknowledged that not all institutions offer research opportunities. Letters of recommendation play a significant role in the application process, with strong endorsements from professors being essential. The discussion emphasizes that while theoretical physics requires a solid foundation in mathematics, including courses like Calculus, Linear Algebra, and Differential Equations, programming skills may also be beneficial. Additionally, publications in academic journals can enhance an application. Overall, aspiring graduate students should focus on maintaining a high GPA, gaining research experience, and securing strong recommendations to improve their chances of acceptance into reputable programs.
Judas503
Messages
22
Reaction score
0
Hey guys,

I'm a physics major and in my freshman years. One of the things I keep hearing is how competitive grad schools can get. So, I ask you lot "What are the requirements to get into a grad school for physics"? Well, I mostly want to hear things other than a good GPA (which is obvious).

Also, to study theoretical physics, which math courses are a MUST? In my university, physics majors take Calculus, Linear Algebra, Differential Equations, Complex Analysis, Numerical Analysis and Fourier Analysis. Moreover, we get Group Theory, Tensor Analysis and Mathematical Physics in electives. (On contrary, can these topics be covered by merely self-study?).
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I'm curious: what do you cover in "mathematical physics"?
 
The requirements are a bachelors in physics with a GPA of at least 3.0 and usually the GRE and physics GRE. To have a shot at some good programs, you'll need a higher GPA and some research experience. Look into working for someone at your school over the summer, and after that, other schools or national labs. It doesn't matter if it's not in the field you think you want to specialize in; any research experience helps. Top grad schools want students who have shown a great deal of skill or potential when it comes to doing original work. Remember, theoretical physics is a way of approaching physics, not a field of physics itself. Depending on the specific field you're interested in, taking computer science/programming classes might be more useful than a lot of math courses.
 
I disagree somewhat with eri on the importance of research.

If you are at a small teaching school with no research to speak of, that's not the end of the world. Grad schools understand this. That isn't to say it isn't a good idea to try and get some experience, perhaps during the summer, but it's not a deal-breaker. Where it becomes more problematic is at the big research universities: there the question will pop into everyone's mind "If he wants to get a research degree from us, why didn't he take advantage of his opportunities as an undergrad?"

Second, I would say that a 3.0 knocks you out of the running pretty much everywhere. A B is for all intents and purposes the minimum passing grade in grad classes, which are harder than undergrad classes. You see the problem?

Finally, letters of recommendation are extremely important. Obviously, research is a good source of letters. The deal-breakers are the ones that say "He got a B+ in my class" and little else. I can tell that; I have the transcript. If your professor could find nothing else positive to say, that is not good at all.
 
It's certainly true research isn't required to get into programs. But you're talking about earning a research degree - the biggest thing they'll be wondering is whether or not you're going to be able to do research, and if you'll be interested enough in it to bother. That's something you really should determine before heading off to earn a PhD, even in you're at a school where professors aren't doing much or any research themselves (which is hard to find these days - research is expected pretty much everywhere).
 
Where I live and study (certainly not in USA and Europe), there isn't much to talk about when it comes to research. I'm quite sure about maintaining a very good GPA, I don't think that's a problem. Moreover, I've also heard that publications in journals helps a lot getting into grad schools. And thanks for your help guys. I'll definitely look into finding some scopes for research.
 
TL;DR Summary: I want to do a PhD in applied math but I hate group theory, is this a big problem? Hello, I am a second-year math and physics double major with a minor in data science. I just finished group theory (today actually), and it was my least favorite class in all of university so far. It doesn't interest me, and I am also very bad at it compared to other math courses I have done. The other courses I have done are calculus I-III, ODEs, Linear Algebra, and Prob/Stats. Is it a...
I’ve been looking through the curricula of several European theoretical/mathematical physics MSc programs (ETH, Oxford, Cambridge, LMU, ENS Paris, etc), and I’m struck by how little emphasis they place on advanced fundamental courses. Nearly everything seems to be research-adjacent: string theory, quantum field theory, quantum optics, cosmology, soft matter physics, black hole radiation, etc. What I don’t see are the kinds of “second-pass fundamentals” I was hoping for, things like...

Similar threads

Replies
12
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
3K
Replies
9
Views
2K
Replies
12
Views
2K
Replies
26
Views
5K
Back
Top