What are the rules for argument division in complex numbers?

  • Thread starter Thread starter bonbon22
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Argument Division
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the rule for argument division in complex numbers, specifically that arg(z1/z2) equals arg(z1) minus arg(z2). This relationship is derived from the polar form of complex numbers and the properties of the exponential function. Participants express confusion about the similarity to logarithmic rules, questioning the underlying principles. It is clarified that the argument function does not cancel out the modulus but rather focuses solely on the angles involved. The conversation emphasizes the importance of understanding these foundational concepts in complex number operations.
bonbon22
Messages
92
Reaction score
5
Homework Statement
This argument is equal to , arg(z1/z2) = arg(z1) - arg(z2) as said by exam solutions need help understanding why.
Relevant Equations
arg(z1/z2) = arg(z1)-arg(z2)


above video states that arg(z1/z2) = arg(z1) - arg(z2) this is seems very similar to Log rules but these are inverse function for angles right? And log rules only apply to logarithms, not sure where he got this from? What am i missing?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
bonbon22 said:
Homework Statement: This argument is equal to , arg(z1/z2) = arg(z1) - arg(z2) as said by exam solutions need help understanding why.
Homework Equations: arg(z1/z2) = arg(z1)-arg(z2)



above video states that arg(z1/z2) = arg(z1) - arg(z2) this is seems very similar to Log rules but these are inverse function for angles right? And log rules only apply to logarithms, not sure where he got this from? What am i missing?


Complex numbers can be expressed in polar form: ##z_1 = r_1e^{i\theta_1}, z_2 = r_2 e^{i\theta_2}##, where ##r## is the modulus and ##\theta## is the argument.

##z_1/z_2 = (r_1/r_2)e^{i(\theta_1 - \theta_2)}##

This uses the properties of the exponential function.
 
PeroK said:
Complex numbers can be expressed in polar form: ##z_1 = r_1e^{i\theta_1}, z_2 = r_2 e^{i\theta_2}##, where ##r## is the modulus and ##\theta## is the argument.

##z_1/z_2 = (r_1/r_2)e^{i(\theta_1 - \theta_2)}##

This uses the properties of the exponential function.
i see that makes sense does the argument function cancel out the (r_1/r_2)e^{i] so you are just left with theta 1 - theta 2?
 
bonbon22 said:
i see that makes sense does the argument function cancel out the (r_1/r_2)e^{i] so you are just left with theta 1 - theta 2?

The argument is the angle ##\theta## in that expression. I would't say there is any cancelling out, as such. Would you say the "hair colour" function cancels out the rest of your body and just leaves the hair colour?
 
  • Like
Likes bonbon22
Also ## Arg(z \cdot w)= Argz+Argw -2k\pi ##
As PeroK wrote, if ##w = re^{it} \rightarrow 1/w= (1/r )e^{-it} ##. Edit: We must assume ## w \neq 0 ##.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes bonbon22
I picked up this problem from the Schaum's series book titled "College Mathematics" by Ayres/Schmidt. It is a solved problem in the book. But what surprised me was that the solution to this problem was given in one line without any explanation. I could, therefore, not understand how the given one-line solution was reached. The one-line solution in the book says: The equation is ##x \cos{\omega} +y \sin{\omega} - 5 = 0##, ##\omega## being the parameter. From my side, the only thing I could...
Back
Top