What are the rules for argument division in complex numbers?

  • Thread starter Thread starter bonbon22
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Argument Division
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around the rules for the argument of complex numbers, specifically focusing on the relationship expressed as arg(z1/z2) = arg(z1) - arg(z2). Participants are exploring the implications of this relationship and its similarity to logarithmic rules.

Discussion Character

  • Conceptual clarification, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants are questioning the reasoning behind the argument division rule and its connection to logarithmic properties. There is an exploration of the polar form of complex numbers and how it relates to the argument function.

Discussion Status

Some participants have provided insights into the polar representation of complex numbers and how it leads to the argument division rule. There is an ongoing examination of whether the argument function simplifies the expression by canceling out other components, with differing views on this aspect.

Contextual Notes

Participants are considering the implications of the argument function and its relationship to the properties of complex numbers, including assumptions about non-zero values for certain variables.

bonbon22
Messages
92
Reaction score
5
Homework Statement
This argument is equal to , arg(z1/z2) = arg(z1) - arg(z2) as said by exam solutions need help understanding why.
Relevant Equations
arg(z1/z2) = arg(z1)-arg(z2)


above video states that arg(z1/z2) = arg(z1) - arg(z2) this is seems very similar to Log rules but these are inverse function for angles right? And log rules only apply to logarithms, not sure where he got this from? What am i missing?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
bonbon22 said:
Homework Statement: This argument is equal to , arg(z1/z2) = arg(z1) - arg(z2) as said by exam solutions need help understanding why.
Homework Equations: arg(z1/z2) = arg(z1)-arg(z2)



above video states that arg(z1/z2) = arg(z1) - arg(z2) this is seems very similar to Log rules but these are inverse function for angles right? And log rules only apply to logarithms, not sure where he got this from? What am i missing?


Complex numbers can be expressed in polar form: ##z_1 = r_1e^{i\theta_1}, z_2 = r_2 e^{i\theta_2}##, where ##r## is the modulus and ##\theta## is the argument.

##z_1/z_2 = (r_1/r_2)e^{i(\theta_1 - \theta_2)}##

This uses the properties of the exponential function.
 
PeroK said:
Complex numbers can be expressed in polar form: ##z_1 = r_1e^{i\theta_1}, z_2 = r_2 e^{i\theta_2}##, where ##r## is the modulus and ##\theta## is the argument.

##z_1/z_2 = (r_1/r_2)e^{i(\theta_1 - \theta_2)}##

This uses the properties of the exponential function.
i see that makes sense does the argument function cancel out the (r_1/r_2)e^{i] so you are just left with theta 1 - theta 2?
 
bonbon22 said:
i see that makes sense does the argument function cancel out the (r_1/r_2)e^{i] so you are just left with theta 1 - theta 2?

The argument is the angle ##\theta## in that expression. I would't say there is any cancelling out, as such. Would you say the "hair colour" function cancels out the rest of your body and just leaves the hair colour?
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: bonbon22
Also ## Arg(z \cdot w)= Argz+Argw -2k\pi ##
As PeroK wrote, if ##w = re^{it} \rightarrow 1/w= (1/r )e^{-it} ##. Edit: We must assume ## w \neq 0 ##.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: bonbon22

Similar threads

Replies
39
Views
6K
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
4K
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
10
Views
5K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
8K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K