What are the solutions to ln(z) = 1 and ln(-e^2)?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Claire84
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Log Negative
AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on solving the equations ln(z) = 1 and ln(-e^2). For ln(-e^2), the correct solution is z = 2 + i(2m + 1)π, indicating multiple solutions due to the periodic nature of the logarithm. In addressing ln(z) = 1, the participant initially concluded that z = 1/e, but later clarified that the correct interpretation leads to z = e^(-1) and also includes z = -1/e, considering the argument of z. The conversation emphasizes the importance of recognizing all possible solutions in complex logarithmic equations. Overall, the participants seek confirmation on their interpretations and completeness of the solutions.
Claire84
Messages
218
Reaction score
0
Hi there, I was hoping someone could check my solutions here to make sure I'm on the right track with these. We've been asked to find ALL values of z satisfying the following eqts -
z= ln(-e^2)

which I did by letting ln (-e^2)= ln|-e^2| + iarg(-e^2)
= e^2 + i(pi + 2m(pi)) where m = 0, +1, -1, +2, -2...

are these all the solutions or am I supposed to go further with this to show ALL the solutions?

I've another problem with ln(z)=1 because I have this = ln|z) +iarg(z) so 1=ln|z) when you compare real and imaginary parts. So then we get e^1=|z| so is z just 1/e? It just doesn't seem right to me, since we only get one solution and the question kinda hints at more than one (or maybe it' just the drink talking here!).

Any help would be much appreciated. Thanks! :blushing:
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I don't think you have the second part quite right. I get something different for z
 
z = ln(-e^2) = ln(-1) + ln(e^2) = 2 + i(2m+1)\pi

That's what you wanted to write, I think ?

And I'm not clear where the 1/e came from, in the second part...
 
Last edited:
Yup, that's what I got for the first one. Was a bit tiddly poo when writing it up tho- sorry! Is that all I have to state for it when it just asks for all the solutions?

In the second one, it wa meant to be ln(z)=-1 (sorry, I'm not drinking again!) so I let -1=ln|z| so then I took exponentials of both sides so I had e^(-1)=|z| so 1/e would equal z. I wasn't sure about having z also equal to -1/e, because since ln(z) = ln|z| + iarg(z) then for z=-1/e then the arg would have to be pi or something...
 
Oh, and thanks for helping me before. :smile:
 
Could someone maybe clarify if what I've done with the second part is okay now? Thanks, I'm just not sure if that's the only solution I can get. I think it is but I'm not 100% sure. :smile:
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top