What are the steps for solving problems involving forces and energy?

  • Thread starter Thread starter KingNothing
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on solving physics problems involving forces and energy, particularly using the Work-Energy Theorem and conservation of energy principles. Participants analyze two scenarios: a pool ball struck by a cue and a shopping cart rolling down a hill. They clarify how to calculate work done and kinetic energy, emphasizing the importance of understanding units and energy conservation. The conversation highlights the relationship between potential energy and kinetic energy, especially in the context of the cart and the can. Ultimately, they arrive at a solution for the dent caused by the can, demonstrating the application of these concepts in problem-solving.
KingNothing
Messages
880
Reaction score
4
Sorry...I hope I'm not annoying anyone. I really have tried to figure out how to do these, but I just can't get it. I hate just throwing problems out there, but I don't really have a better way of doing it.

"Karmen is playing pool, and strikes a 0.25 kg ball, making it go 1.5 m/s. If Karmen used the force of the cue on the ball with 20 N, over what distance did it act?"

I think I should use W=Fd at some point, but still, that gives W=20d which still doesn't get anywehere.

"A 30 kg shopping cart is on a 2m hill and rolls down to hit a stump at the very bottom. At impact, a .25 kg can flies and hits a car with an average force of 490N. How deep is the dent?"

I think we are supposed to assume the metal did work in stopping it. I really don't know!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Use Work Energy Theorem
W = \Delta K
 
What is K in that equation?
 
Kinetic energy. More commonly denoted T or KE.

cookiemonster
 
Okay...so if KE=.5mv^2, then...
KE=(.5)(.25)(1.5)^2
KE=0.28125 J, right?
Or is it even in Joules? I'm really confused about the units of measurement.

Anyhoo...
Work=.28125
Work=Fd
20d=.28125
d=0.0140625 m, right?

How in the world do we figure the can's velocity? Really. The fact that the cart rolled down the hill would not mean anything about the cans velocity unless given the hill's angle, right?

If not, how do I find the velocity of something at the end of a hill of x height?
 
Decker said:
How in the world do we figure the can's velocity? Really. The fact that the cart rolled down the hill would not mean anything about the cans velocity unless given the hill's angle, right?

If not, how do I find the velocity of something at the end of a hill of x height?

You use the same basic idea:

Conservation of energy.

Assuming no friction (which I'm guessing is the case for this problem even if it didn't state it specifically), It doesn't matter what angle the cart rolls down the hill. As long as the hill is the same height, you'll end up with the same velocity at the bottom regardless of angle (try it!)

mgh=1/2 mV2
 
mgh=(30)(9.8)(2)
SO the cart has potential energy of 588 kilogram-meters per second squared-meters.
And we are saying that the can receives the full amount, in kinetic energy?

588=.5(.25)v^2
v=68.59 m/s!

Wowzas. Anyhoo. Delta-KE=Work
588=490d
d=1.2 meters!

I really doubt that. Where'd I mess up?
 
Decker said:
And we are saying that the can receives the full amount, in kinetic energy?
No, but both the cart and the can fall the same distance. Figure out the ΔPE of the can--that will be the KE of the can at the bottom of the hill, when it flies out of the cart.
 
Alright, I see...so it's potential energy will simply be .25/30 of the whole cart's, right? That'd be 4.9 units of energy.

So...4.9=490d
d=0.01 m or 1 cm.

Sounds great! Thank you all!
 

Similar threads

Back
Top