What Are the Turning Points in Alpha Decay Potential Barrier?

arierreF
Messages
78
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



A nuclei of a atomic number Z decays into a alpha particle (a He nucleus with Z =2) and a daughter nucleus with (Z_{d}).
The decay may be described as the tunneling of an alpha-particle through a barrier caused by the Coulomb potential between the daughter and the alpha-particle.

The potential is: V(r) = \frac{1}{4\piε_{0}}\frac{2Z_{d}e^{2}}{r}
Knowing that the probability of transmission , T, is proportional to

T \propto e^{{-2* \int_a^b \sqrt{\frac{2m(V(r)-E)}{\hbar }} \,dr }}

Calculate the turning points, a and b.
Notes: The diagram for the potential barrier is shown inf the link:
https://www.google.pt/search?q=alph...taneous_Decay_Processes_-_Alpha_Decay;624;354Im stuck in this problem. I know that i can calculate the turning points at V(r) = E(r), but i do not have E(r). Can u give me a tip for solve this problem?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I found the second turning point doing the following:

E(r_{2})=V(r_{2})

so


V(r_{2}) = \frac{1}{4\piε_{0}}\frac{2Z_{d}e^{2}}{r_{2}}

then we r_{2} = \frac{1}{4\piε_{0}}\frac{2Z_{d}e^{2}}{E(r_{2})}
 
Last edited:
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...

Similar threads

Back
Top