What Are the Values of Young's Modulus and Poisson's Ratio for Sand?

AI Thread Summary
Young's modulus and Poisson's ratio for sand are not universally defined due to its granular nature, which lacks continuity. Density specifications, including moisture content, are crucial for accurate calculations. The inquiry is focused on calculating erosion caused by high-velocity sand grains, particularly dry quicksand. Literature exists that provides varying values for different types of sand, but clarity is needed on specific conditions. Additionally, there is a request for references to calculate energy loss of a spherical particle upon impact, emphasizing the need for precise data beyond basic kinetic energy equations.
ranaroy
Messages
12
Reaction score
0
dear all,

pls inform me the Young's modulus (in Pa) and Poisson's ration for sand. Pleae also inform the density of sand taken (as it affects the requested values).

many thanks in advance
kind regards,

rana
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I honestly do not see how you can have a Young's Modulus or Poisson's Ratio for a grain. The material not continuous.

Density would have to be specified with a specific moisture content as well.

What leads you to ask this question? Are you trying to calculate something?
 
sir,

yes, i am trying to calculate erosion caused by sand grain.

there are may literature data available for various tyoes of sand, and so i am confused.
i am using sand blown by air (maybe dry quicksand or something) at high velocities..

hope to get the values..a reference to online literature would also be helpful.

thank you.
 
energy of impact

dear all,

i would like to calculate the energy loss of a spherical particle after it hits the wall.
i know the pre- and post-impact velocties and the coefficients of restitution.

simple E = E1 = 1/2*m*u^2 is not enough.

can someone point me any exact references.

thanks in advance.
 
comparing a flat solar panel of area 2π r² and a hemisphere of the same area, the hemispherical solar panel would only occupy the area π r² of while the flat panel would occupy an entire 2π r² of land. wouldn't the hemispherical version have the same area of panel exposed to the sun, occupy less land space and can therefore increase the number of panels one land can have fitted? this would increase the power output proportionally as well. when I searched it up I wasn't satisfied with...
Back
Top