What are you currently trying to prove / disprove?

  • Thread starter Thread starter uperkurk
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the challenges and approaches in exploring concepts within mathematics and physics. One participant expresses a lack of confidence in their mathematical maturity while studying abstract algebra, specifically focusing on quotient rings and homomorphisms. They share a challenging homework problem related to proving the well-defined nature of a homomorphism. Another participant emphasizes a cautious approach in physics, stating that results should confirm or not confirm theories rather than prove them. Their thesis involves exploratory research, generating numerous hypotheses from simulations and analyzing them for uniqueness and reproducibility. They highlight the importance of packaging findings into a narrative that demonstrates significance to human understanding or applications. The conversation reflects a broader theme of navigating complexity and uncertainty in academic research within these fields.
uperkurk
Messages
167
Reaction score
0
So is there anything in particular you're trying to prove or disprove within the fields of maths or physics? Are you making any progress? How would your findings affect our understanding of a related topic?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
uperkurk said:
So is there anything in particular you're trying to prove or disprove within the fields of maths or physics? Are you making any progress? How would your findings affect our understanding of a related topic?

I don't believe I'm mathematically mature enough to work on anything that will further our understanding of mathematics, but we've begun to study quotient rings and homomorphisms in my abstract algebra course, so I'm working on proving theorems about these structures. It has been an incredibly difficult course, as I've never had to think at this level of abstraction before.

Here is a homework problem I just finished:

Let f:R\to S be a homomorphism of rings with kernel K. Let I be an ideal in R such that I\subseteq K. Show that \bar{f}:R/ I \to S given by \bar{f}(r+I)=f(r) is a well-defined homomorphism. :cry:

----------------------------------------------------

My physics lab instructor told us to never claim our results "prove" anything in our reports. Our results either "confirm" or "do not confirm" the theory in question.
 
Mt thesis is more exploratory. You take a new system and you play with it, make simulations, analyze result in creative ways. Hundreds of potential hypotheses basically just fall out of the system.

Then you have to see which of those hypotheses are new, unique, and reproducible and package them into an interesting story that demonstrates the significance of the research to humans (in regard to either understanding or applications).
 
uperkurk said:
So is there anything in particular you're trying to prove or disprove within the fields of maths or physics?

...applied physics on fractination of isotopes and temperature?

https://dl.dropbox.com/u/22026080/non-calor-sed-umor.pdf

Are you making any progress?


None whatsoever, but that's to be expected probably.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
https://www.newsweek.com/robert-redford-dead-hollywood-live-updates-2130559 Apparently Redford was a somewhat poor student, so was headed to Europe to study art and painting, but stopped in New York and studied acting. Notable movies include Barefoot in the Park (1967 with Jane Fonda), Butch Cassidy and the Sundance Kid (1969, with Paul Newma), Jeremiah Johnson, the political drama The Candidate (both 1972), The Sting (1973 with Paul Newman), the romantic dramas The Way We Were (1973), and...
Back
Top