What are you supposed to show when you have no data to present?

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the challenges of presenting in a scientific context when there is no data to show, particularly during preparation phases for experiments. Participants explore strategies for effectively communicating progress and plans despite the absence of concrete results.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested
  • Meta-discussion

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants express frustration about the lack of data to present, emphasizing the need for preparation and the challenges faced during this phase.
  • Questions are raised regarding the specifics of what will be measured, data requirements, storage, and scheduling, indicating a structured approach to the experimental process.
  • One participant suggests that the answers to preparatory questions could be summarized in a PowerPoint presentation, highlighting the importance of outlining resources and the purpose of the study.
  • Concerns are voiced about the expectations of mini presentations, which typically feature limited slides of data, leading to anxiety about presenting unfinished work.
  • Advice is given to focus on the narrative of the research, including progress, challenges, and potential solutions, rather than solely on data.
  • Some participants share humorous suggestions and anecdotes about the nature of presentations, indicating a mix of seriousness and levity in addressing the topic.
  • Historical examples are mentioned to illustrate that problems encountered during experiments can be as interesting as the intended results.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants generally agree on the importance of effectively communicating progress and challenges in the absence of data. However, there are varying opinions on how best to approach presentations and the expectations surrounding them, indicating that multiple views remain on the topic.

Contextual Notes

Participants express uncertainty about how to balance the need for presentation with the reality of ongoing experimental challenges. There is also a recognition that not all presentations align neatly with data collection timelines.

Who May Find This Useful

This discussion may be useful for researchers, students, and professionals in scientific fields who encounter similar challenges in presenting work during preparatory phases or when facing experimental setbacks.

ProfuselyQuarky
Gold Member
Messages
857
Reaction score
588
Like when you're doing tons of things but it's mostly preparation for experiments and it's not really working so it's slowing experiments down. There's tons to talk about but there's really nothing to show anyone in terms of a powerpoint.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Have you determined what you will be measuring and how?
Have you decided how much data you will need and where you are going to get it from?
Have you made arrangements for where the data will be stored, how it will be moved, and what tools you will be using?
Do you have a schedule?
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: hutchphd and russ_watters
.Scott said:
Have you determined what you will be measuring and how?
Have you decided how much data you will need and where you are going to get it from?
Have you made arrangements for where the data will be stored, how it will be moved, and what tools you will be using?
Do you have a schedule?
well, yes lol. I should've been data collecting today but a series of terrible things that happened and due to the nature of what I am doing I won't be able to attempt again for another week or so
 
ProfuselyQuarky said:
well, yes lol. I should've been data collecting today but a series of terrible things that happened and due to the nature of what I am doing I won't be able to attempt again for another week or so
My point is that the answer to each of those questions is a powerpoint slide.
What resources (office space, lab space, assistance, equipment) do you need? What arrangements have you made for them?

You can also address the purpose of the study - and what the meaning would be for different ranges of results.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: russ_watters
.Scott said:
My point is that the answer to each of those questions is a powerpoint slide.
What resources (office space, lab space, assistance, equipment) do you need? What arrangements have you made for them?

You can also address the purpose of the study - and what the meaning would be for different ranges of results.
this is fair thanks for the suggestion.
I guess I'm worried because everyone will find it odd since, unless it's our turn to give the full one hour presentation, then these mini presentations usually consist of just 1 - 3 slides of unfinished figures/graphs of data that you explain and run through. It's exclusively images, mainly. Context is then shared verbally. I'll do what I have to, however lol.
 
Can you tap dance? I recommend Tea For Two. :wink:

These are called "prospects talks" and many people (including me) hate giving them. But they are a part of the job - not every talk is neatly timed to when you're getting the data. But the advice is the same for prospects talks: figure out what you are going to say and say it. For example, an outline might be:
  • What are we trying to measure? Why is it important?
  • Who did it before?
  • How this measurement works. What equipment do you use?
  • What is the status of the apparatus? Do you have pictures?
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: dextercioby, hutchphd, gleem and 1 other person
Experiments don't go according to plan. You've put a lot of work into it so far. So you describe your progress, the difficulties, and solutions that you can try to overcome them. But make sure that the next time around you have something to show as the solution to your previous problem or preliminary data.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: BillTre
And be relentlessly positive. One can always shower after the presentation.
 
  • Like
  • Haha
Likes   Reactions: BillTre, Vanadium 50, gleem and 1 other person
hutchphd said:
And be relentlessly positive.
As in "I'm positive this isn't working"?
 
  • #10
As in "I found a really interesting reason why doing the experiment adjacent to the NMR magnet was not a good idea......"
 
  • #11
Fermilab E-711 was nicknamed the "Colliding Magnet Experiment"

Sometimes the reason there are problems are at least as interesting as what the experiment set out to do. The half-life of bismuth was discovered by people looking at BGO as a detector medium. KATRIN discovered a background from highly excited atomic hydrogen - like n = 50, 60 or 70. And there is a famouse case of Penzias and Wislon's noise in their apparatus....
 
  • Like
  • Love
Likes   Reactions: berkeman and DaveC426913
  • #12
Just don't go all LK-99 with it.
 
  • Haha
Likes   Reactions: berkeman
  • #13
Haborix said:
Just don't go all LK-99 with it.

1695934620897.png

https://www.nature.com/articles/s41567-023-02225-x
 
  • Haha
Likes   Reactions: Haborix
  • #14
So how did it go?
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 85 ·
3
Replies
85
Views
6K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 24 ·
Replies
24
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K