What book to use to get familiar with the epsilon-delta stuff?

  • Thread starter Thread starter theoristo
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Book
AI Thread Summary
To gain a solid understanding of definitions involving "epsilon" and "delta" in calculus, two recommended books are highlighted, one focusing on conceptual understanding and the other covering multivariable topics. Both books assume prior knowledge of calculus and suggest that readers also engage with a logic or proof book for deeper comprehension. Spivak's "Calculus" is noted for its challenging problems, which can be rewarding for dedicated readers. While it may take time to grasp concepts like limits, mastering these foundational ideas can facilitate their application in more advanced mathematical contexts such as metric spaces and measure theory.
theoristo
Messages
151
Reaction score
3
What book do you recommend to use to get familiar with definitions that usually contain the phrase “given any positive epsilon, however small, delta can be found such that . . .”:wink:thank you
 
Physics news on Phys.org
If I could go back I'd learn from Spivak, Calculus.
 
  • Like
Likes 1 person
There are many ways to answer this question.

Here are two cheap books that would give you a rather complete understanding. The first is more conceptual while the second includes multivariable topics. Both assume that you know calculus. But to get value from these, you'll probably need a logic or proof book as well as some dedication.

Without doing the whole proof thing, I'm not sure what to suggest. I'll let others who are more familiar with the calculus books that are out there answer.

Books:
https://www.amazon.com/dp/0486650383/?tag=pfamazon01-20
https://www.amazon.com/dp/0486457958/?tag=pfamazon01-20

PS. I should add that I interpret "get familiar with definitions that use epsilon and delta" to mean, getting familiar with the definitions, understanding them in the context of the theory of calculus.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • Like
Likes 1 person
Regarding Spivak's book, I quote what I wrote in the more recent thread:

I have only read the first edition of Spivak and for me, the problems were a little too difficult and left me feeling beat up after solving them. But for the right reader, it would be a highly enjoyable read for sure.
 
I learned the concept from spivak. It took me a very long time to understand the concept of a limit. However once I really got it it was surprisingly easy to apply the concept in more general settings (metric spaces, measure theory, etc).
 
TL;DR Summary: Book after Sakurai Modern Quantum Physics I am doing a comprehensive reading of sakurai and I have solved every problem from chapters I finished on my own, I will finish the book within 2 weeks and I want to delve into qft and other particle physics related topics, not from summaries but comprehensive books, I will start a graduate program related to cern in 3 months, I alreadily knew some qft but now I want to do it, hence do a good book with good problems in it first...
TLDR: is Blennow "Mathematical Methods for Physics and Engineering" a good follow-up to Altland "Mathematics for physicists"? Hello everybody, returning to physics after 30-something years, I felt the need to brush up my maths first. It took me 6 months and I'm currently more than half way through the Altland "Mathematics for physicists" book, covering the math for undergraduate studies at the right level of sophystication, most of which I howewer already knew (being an aerospace engineer)...

Similar threads

Back
Top