What Causes an Object to Stop after a Collision?

  • Thread starter Thread starter mike_302
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Momentum Zero
AI Thread Summary
In a collision between two balls, the conservation of momentum dictates that the total momentum before the collision equals the total momentum after. In this scenario, a 0.25 kg ball traveling at 1.7 m/s collides with a 0.18 kg ball moving at 2.5 m/s, resulting in the 0.25 kg ball reversing direction at 0.10 m/s. The 0.18 kg ball's speed after the collision is determined to be 0 m/s, indicating it comes to a complete stop. There are no specific indicators that suggest an object will stop in a collision other than the results from momentum calculations. Understanding momentum conservation is crucial in analyzing collision outcomes.
mike_302
Messages
102
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Two balls roll directly towards each other. The 0.25kg ball has a speed of 1.7m/s. The 0.18kg ball has speed of 2.5m/s. After the collision, the 0.25kg ball has reversed its direction and has a speed of 0.10m/s . What is the magnitude and direction of the 0.18 kg ball after hte collision?


Homework Equations


P(total)=P'(total)


The Attempt at a Solution



I know the answer... IT's 0 m/s . Further question though:

On a test, I'd be questioning that result. As I did when I first obtained it in the homework... So I thought to myself: Zero tends not to just come out of nowhere... There's usuall an indicator that it's coming. What is the indicator that one of the objects in a collision will stop? Is there any sort of indicator in this case?

Thanks!

Mike
 
Physics news on Phys.org
There's no special indicator in this case other than the momentum conservation calculation.
 
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
Back
Top