What Causes Equal Interference Amplitudes in Light Diffraction Patterns?

Click For Summary
The discussion centers on the equal amplitudes observed in light diffraction patterns, particularly in double-slit experiments. Participants clarify that while the intensity decreases away from the central maximum due to single-slit diffraction effects, the interference pattern from two identical slits maintains equal amplitudes at the maxima. The key point is that the calculated interference pattern assumes infinitely narrow slits, leading to constant intensity across the maxima. To achieve a more accurate representation, the interference pattern must be multiplied by the diffraction pattern, particularly when considering slits of finite width. Understanding this relationship helps clarify why the amplitudes appear equal in the context of idealized double-slit interference.
waley
Here's a picture that was in my textbook - they are the patterns of interference and diffraction of a light wave. I don't get why the interference amplitudes are all equal. Aren't they supposed to be higher in the middle and lower as they move away from the center??
 

Attachments

  • interference and diffrac.PNG
    interference and diffrac.PNG
    36.8 KB · Views: 665
Science news on Phys.org
Why do you expect them to be different?
The single-slit pattern makes them different, so what you actually see (the red curve) is different, but the two slits always show the same constructive interference in all these maxima.
 
mfb said:
Why do you expect them to be different?
The single-slit pattern makes them different, so what you actually see (the red curve) is different, but the two slits always show the same constructive interference in all these maxima.
Doesn't intensity decrease as you go further from the central max?
 
Only from the single-slit-like pattern. That's what the graph shows.
 
mfb said:
Only from the single-slit-like pattern. That's what the graph shows.
I thought the purple line on the graph showed the interference pattern of a double slit. I get that the product of the interference and diffraction patterns should produce a pattern with descending intensity, it's just the equal amplitudes of the purple line that's tripping me up. So are you saying that intensity of a double slit interference pattern is constant?
 
In the limit of infinitely narrow slits, and with the approximation that the whole screen has the same distance to the slits (apart from the path differences between the slits), yes.
 
mfb said:
In the limit of infinitely narrow slits, and with the approximation that the whole screen has the same distance to the slits (apart from the path differences between the slits), yes.
Ohh I think I get it. It's only with diffraction that you consider a finite slit width. Thanks for the help
 
The calculated interference pattern never gives the totally right answer but it gives a good idea of how narrow the peaks will be. What you do for a better answer is to multiply the interference pattern by the slit diffraction. It only works when ALL slits are identical.
 
  • Like
Likes sophiecentaur

Similar threads

Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
8K
  • · Replies 54 ·
2
Replies
54
Views
10K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
  • · Replies 30 ·
2
Replies
30
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
8K