What Causes Spacetime to Return to Uniformity?

cosmonium
Messages
6
Reaction score
0
so i am somewhat new to the theory of general relativity but in none of the papers i have read does anyone seem to explain what causes matter to attract... for example, the moon and the Earth are attracted to each other because each of them warps spacetime around themselves. these warped pockets could be thought of as low density areas in spacetime. Einstein says they attract because they are following the curvature of spacetime but what drives that motion? the only thing i can think of that would cause objects to want to clump together in a spacetime field is if spacetime is somehow elastic. it is as if for whatever reason there is a pressure-like force causing spacetime to want to return to a uniform distribution. is there a term for such a force and if so what causes it?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
cosmonium said:
Einstein says they attract because they are following the curvature of spacetime but what drives that motion?
Inertia. GR says that gravitational motion is inertial motion.
 
interesting... could you expand on that? assuming 2 perfectly stationary objects in space that have are held in place for a long period of time (so any gravitational waves have already passed by) and then released, what about their inertia causes them to slope down the spacetime curvature?
 
You need to generalise velocity to the four-dimensional equivalent, the four-velocity. This is never zero; it always has length 1 in geometric units. For the case of a stationary (in the 3d sense) mass, you can interpret this (probably slightly loosely) as saying that it is only moving through time. But spacetime is curved. So once your masses are released, their inertial paths are curves - which is to say that their velocity vectors rotate and the masses acquire spatial motion.

You'll need to learn up to connection coefficients and the geodesic equation to get a rigorous explanation of that.
 
  • Like
Likes Dale
cosmonium said:
interesting... could you expand on that? assuming 2 perfectly stationary objects in space that have are held in place for a long period of time (so any gravitational waves have already passed by) and then released, what about their inertia causes them to slope down the spacetime curvature?
Are you aware that on a sphere a great circle forms a "straight line" aka "a geodesic". If so, consider two nearby longitude lines. They are geodesics, and they are parallel at the equator but intersect at the poles.
 
  • Like
Likes cosmonium
OK, so this has bugged me for a while about the equivalence principle and the black hole information paradox. If black holes "evaporate" via Hawking radiation, then they cannot exist forever. So, from my external perspective, watching the person fall in, they slow down, freeze, and redshift to "nothing," but never cross the event horizon. Does the equivalence principle say my perspective is valid? If it does, is it possible that that person really never crossed the event horizon? The...
In this video I can see a person walking around lines of curvature on a sphere with an arrow strapped to his waist. His task is to keep the arrow pointed in the same direction How does he do this ? Does he use a reference point like the stars? (that only move very slowly) If that is how he keeps the arrow pointing in the same direction, is that equivalent to saying that he orients the arrow wrt the 3d space that the sphere is embedded in? So ,although one refers to intrinsic curvature...
So, to calculate a proper time of a worldline in SR using an inertial frame is quite easy. But I struggled a bit using a "rotating frame metric" and now I'm not sure whether I'll do it right. Couls someone point me in the right direction? "What have you tried?" Well, trying to help truly absolute layppl with some variation of a "Circular Twin Paradox" not using an inertial frame of reference for whatevere reason. I thought it would be a bit of a challenge so I made a derivation or...
Back
Top