What Causes the Hydrodynamic Paradox in Water Springs?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the hydrodynamic paradox observed in water springs, particularly how water streams behave differently with horizontal versus vertical hand movements. Cohesion and adhesion are key factors; cohesion causes water to stick together, minimizing surface area, while adhesion causes it to cling to surfaces like fingers. When fingers move horizontally, they create a diversion that allows streams to collide and minimize surface area, whereas vertical movement separates the streams due to horizontal adhesion. The Bernoulli equation is also mentioned, raising questions about its role in creating underpressure near the streams and its effect on their behavior. Understanding these principles can clarify the dynamics of water movement in springs.
Oomph!
Messages
55
Reaction score
0
Hello.

Have you ever seen this experiment?
OK, i know why does the watter flows without cover and does not flows with cover.
However, what about the springs? Why they get together with horizontal hand movement and separate with vertical hand movement?
Liquid always have the possible lowest energy. It is related?

Thank you very much.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
Oomph! said:
However, what about the springs? Why they get together with horizontal hand movement and separate with vertical hand movement? Liquid always have the possible lowest energy. It is related?
Yes. It's about
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cohesion_(chemistry)
versus
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Adhesion

Cohesion makes the water stick together and minimize surface area. Adhesion makes the water stick to the fingers. The vertical finger moving horizontally diverts the streams horizontally so they collide and find a new local minimum surface area. The horizontal finger provides horizontal adhesion that pulls the streams apart. The horizontal deflection after collision with the horizontal finger might also play a role in separating the streams.
 
Last edited:
thank you very much
well, I thought about it and now I have some question. what about Bernoulli equation? ... namely hydrodynamic paradox. it makes underpressure near strings and can connect it together. how much does this affect?
 
The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
Hello everyone, Consider the problem in which a car is told to travel at 30 km/h for L kilometers and then at 60 km/h for another L kilometers. Next, you are asked to determine the average speed. My question is: although we know that the average speed in this case is the harmonic mean of the two speeds, is it also possible to state that the average speed over this 2L-kilometer stretch can be obtained as a weighted average of the two speeds? Best regards, DaTario
Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?
Back
Top