What condition defines a principal stress?

AI Thread Summary
Principal stresses are defined as normal stresses that occur in a given stress state, specifically acting perpendicular to the material's cross-section. In a thin plate under tensile stress, these principal stresses are oriented normal to the plate's sides. For a beam in pure bending, principal stresses correspond to the tensile and compressive stresses on the top and bottom surfaces. In more complex shapes like I beams, Mohr's Circle is used to calculate both principal and shear stresses. Understanding these concepts is essential for engineering applications involving material mechanics.
buxZED
Messages
12
Reaction score
0
What condition defines a principal stress?

thx
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Since I'm studying Engineering I should probably be able to explain this to you in my own words, but this site does a good job of it:
http://www.efunda.com/formulae/solid_mechanics/mat_mechanics/plane_stress_principal.cfm

If you consider a given stress state, principal stresses are defined as stresses that are normal stresses only. So take the easy case of a thin plate, and apply a tensile stress to one end (i.e. try to stretch it). In that case, the principal stresses would be normal to the sides of the plate. If you had a beam with a rectangular cross section in pure bending, the principal stresses would just be equal to the bending stresses, and are tensile and compressive stresses on the top and bottom surface of the beam, assuming you've got a point force (for example) P acting normal to the bottom surface (in the positive direction, bending the beam into an upside down U). Things like I beams are a little different, and in that case you use Mohr's Circle to calculat principal stresses and shear stresses; the website covers that in a good amount of detail.

If I've missed anything or explained anything ambiguously, someone let me know and I'll try to do a better job of it. :P
 
Last edited by a moderator:
this covers the confution I had, thank you verry much

Loki1342 said:
Since I'm studying Engineering I should probably be able to explain this to you in my own words, but this site does a good job of it:
http://www.efunda.com/formulae/solid_mechanics/mat_mechanics/plane_stress_principal.cfm

If you consider a given stress state, principal stresses are defined as stresses that are normal stresses only. So take the easy case of a thin plate, and apply a tensile stress to one end (i.e. try to stretch it). In that case, the principal stresses would be normal to the sides of the plate. If you had a beam with a rectangular cross section in pure bending, the principal stresses would just be equal to the bending stresses, and are tensile and compressive stresses on the top and bottom surface of the beam, assuming you've got a point force (for example) P acting normal to the bottom surface (in the positive direction, bending the beam into an upside down U). Things like I beams are a little different, and in that case you use Mohr's Circle to calculat principal stresses and shear stresses; the website covers that in a good amount of detail.

If I've missed anything or explained anything ambiguously, someone let me know and I'll try to do a better job of it. :P
 
Last edited by a moderator:
I think it's easist first to watch a short vidio clip I find these videos very relaxing to watch .. I got to thinking is this being done in the most efficient way? The sand has to be suspended in the water to move it to the outlet ... The faster the water , the more turbulance and the sand stays suspended, so it seems to me the rule of thumb is the hose be aimed towards the outlet at all times .. Many times the workers hit the sand directly which will greatly reduce the water...
Back
Top