What Determines the Electric Field Inside a Spherical Cavity?

AI Thread Summary
The electric field inside a spherical cavity with a point charge at its center is not zero, contrary to the initial assumption that induced charges on the cavity surface would cancel the field. Instead, the presence of the point charge creates an electric field within the cavity, as supported by Gauss' Law. The electric field can be analyzed without needing the cavity to be symmetric or centered within the sphere. Understanding the behavior of electric fields in this context is essential for solving related problems involving the conducting sphere and the cavity. This scenario highlights the importance of correctly applying electrostatic principles to determine field behavior.
rockbreaker
Messages
6
Reaction score
0
Hi, I am dealing with a problem in Electrostatics.

Homework Statement



There is a sphere with a spherical cavity in it. The sphere itself does not have net charge, but inside the cavity, there is a point charge at the center of the cavity. What's the electric field inside the cavity?

Homework Equations



Gauss' Law, E=Q/(4*Pi*epsilon0*r^2)

The Attempt at a Solution



I assume the field is 0 because the induced charges on the cavity surface cancels the field of the point charge in it. Is this assumption correct?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
rockbreaker said:
I assume the field is 0 because the induced charges on the cavity surface cancels the field of the point charge in it. Is this assumption correct?

No, the assumption isn't correct. The induced charge in fact support that there is an electric field inside the cavity. try to work it out
 
rockbreaker said:
Hi, I am dealing with a problem in Electrostatics.

Homework Statement



There is a sphere with a spherical cavity in it. The sphere itself does not have net charge, but inside the cavity, there is a point charge at the center of the cavity. What's the electric field inside the cavity?

Homework Equations



Gauss' Law, E=Q/(4*Pi*epsilon0*r^2)

The Attempt at a Solution



I assume the field is 0 because the induced charges on the cavity surface cancels the field of the point charge in it. Is this assumption correct?

That assumption isn't correct for the electric field inside the cavity (inside of the surface containing the induced charges).

If it helps to understand why, remember what the electric field is inside of a uniformly charged, spherically symmetric shell without any other charges in it. Then consider what the electric field is if there is an additional charge at the center, all else being the same.

Now use Gauss' Law to apply that to this problem with the cavity. You shouldn't even have to assume that the cavity is symmetric -- it can be of any shape. Also, the cavity, and the charge inside of it, doesn't need to even be centered in the conducting sphere -- it can be anywhere within the sphere.

After you answer this step, it's the next steps that end up being rather fascinating and insightful. You will be invariably asked next to find the electric field within the conducting sphere, but outside the cavity, and then to find the electric field outside of the entire conducting sphere.

Hint: At first this might seem like a very mathematically intense exercise, but it is not. If you use Gauss' Law it turns out to be a surprisingly simple problem (well, comparatively simple for an electrostatics problem anyway). Most of this exercise is thinking about Gauss' Law qualitatively.
 
You're right, I actually confused this problem with a dielectrical sphere. It is pretty obvious using Gauss' Law that there has to be an electric field inside the cavity when there is a charge inside it (which ends at the surface of the cavity to guarantee that the conductor is field-free). Thank you very much!
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top