What Determines the Mass Ratio in a Binary Star System?

  • Thread starter Thread starter mkphysics
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Mass Star
AI Thread Summary
In a binary star system, the mass ratio of the two stars can be determined using their circular motion, expressed as m1/m2 = r2/r1. The discussion explores how to derive this relationship by applying Newton's laws for isolated bodies and considering their accelerations. The angular velocity and tangential acceleration are crucial in the calculations, allowing for the cancellation of velocity terms. The concept of the center of mass is also relevant, though not explicitly detailed in the problem. The analysis concludes that the mass ratio is directly related to the radii of their circular paths.
mkphysics
Messages
4
Reaction score
1
1. The two components of a double star are observed to move in circles of radii r_1 and r_2. What is the ratio of their masses? (Hint: Write down their accelerations in terms of the angular velocity of rotation, w)

The answer is m1/m2 = r2/r1.

How does one cancel the velocity from the problem to get this result?

Homework Equations



For an isolated two body system

m1.a1=-m2.a2
where m are the body masses and a are the accelerations

w=v/r
angular velocity equals velocity divided by radius

a=dw/dt
angular acceleration

The Attempt at a Solution


m1.dw1/dt = m2.dw2/dt

therefore m1.w1=-m2.w2

m1/m2 = -w2/w1

m1/m2 = -(v2/r2)/(v1/r1)

m1/m2 = -v2r1/v1r2
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes comminato
Physics news on Phys.org
Do the stars rotate about any which point or about a specific point? What are this point's properties?
 
Unfortunately all information is contained in the question. This question is taken directly from chapter 1 problem 2 of Classical Mechanics by Kibble and Berkshire. I'm not sure if this is a good book yet or not. From your reply it seems the question does not contain enough information to find the solution given. Can one infer the conditions of the system from the result given (m1/m2 = r2/r1)?
 
I am not familiar with the textbook, but it does not matter. Does "center of mass" ring a bell?
 
I know this is an old post but for anyone looking up this problem, here's how I got to that answer:

Using Newtons law for 2 isolated bodies

m1a1 = -m2a2

The bodies are rotating ( here i guessed at the same velocity).
The motion is rotational so you can use tangential acceleration

aT = w2r and substitute this into above to get

m1 w2r1 = -m2w2r2

cancelling out w2 on both sides, move m's to left and r's to right to get

m1/m2 = -r2/r1
 
  • Like
Likes comminato
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top