What Determines the Strength of an Object's Gravity?

  • Thread starter Thread starter brum
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Gravity Strength
AI Thread Summary
The strength of an object's gravity is primarily determined by its mass, while density plays a secondary role since it relates to how mass is distributed in volume. Each particle within an object does have its own gravitational pull, contributing to the overall gravitational force of the object. When many particles are close together, their individual gravitational pulls combine, resulting in a stronger collective gravitational pull. The mechanisms of gravity are still not fully understood, with theories suggesting it may involve space-time distortion or hypothetical particles called gravitons. Ultimately, the combination of numerous small gravitational forces from individual particles leads to the significant gravitational pull observed in larger objects.
brum
Messages
81
Reaction score
0
I have a good idea of the basics of gravity.

But I have one question...

What determines the strength of an object's gravity? Just mass?
Or does density determine the strength of the gravitation pull?


i have a follow-up question or 2 that depends on what the answer to the above question is, so i'll ask that once my above question gets answered.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The strength of gravity is reliant of an objects mass. The density of an object is derived from the equation D=m/V and so density simply means that a dense object can be smaller than an undense object and have the same gravitational pull.
 
ok. I'm going to continue asking questions regarding gravity in this thread...


does each particle have a gravitational pull? or, rather, does the object as a whole?

also, when a particle is part of an object, that particle contributes to the object's gravitational pull, correct? AND that particle also has its own, personal gravtitational pull on the nearby particles, at the same time?

if each particle has its own gravity (a weak one, obviously), how does one form a "massive object" that has a strong gravitational pull---just by simply being in the vicinity of a bunch of particles, you have a strong gravitational pull?

=======

what are the possible mechanisms for gravity (how exactly does it work?)?

as far as I know, the answer to this question is not known for certain.

the 2 possible mechanisms that I can think of are:

- distorting space-time (i.e. ball on sheet of rubber, bending the surroundings)
- gravitons (-imaginary- particles)
- mix of the above 2?

===
one little thought that just came to me: let's say you are looking at a plane. Got this in your head? A 2D plane in 3D.

Now, this 2D plane represents a collection of particles, which all lie on the plane (say, in a rough circle). There are "dimples" and "bumps" in the plane that represent the strength of the gravitational pull of each, individual particle. 1 billion particles, 1 billion dimples.

So, each particle has its own gravitational pull. Each particle has a slight pull on the surrounding particles.

With me so far?

Ok, so how does this collection of particles have 1 big gravitational pull? It just has a billion "little pulls" -- a bunch of little dimples, not one big huge dip.

And yet, in real life, this collection of particles --aka object-- has a (relatively) large gravitational pull. But -- if you look at the object as a collection of individual particles, all you see is many many dimples!

note: (in real life, it'd actually be a billion billion billion billion ... billion particles, not the "1 billion" that I used for brevity)

So how does this collection of particles, each with their own mass and thus, gravitational pull, suddenly have one, large, collective gravitational pull?
 
Originally posted by brum
does each particle have a gravitational pull? or, rather, does the object as a whole?
Each individual particle has its own pull, but to simplify calculations, we deal mostly with full objects.
also, when a particle is part of an object, that particle contributes to the object's gravitational pull, correct? AND that particle also has its own, personal gravtitational pull on the nearby particles, at the same time?
Pretty much.
if each particle has its own gravity (a weak one, obviously), how does one form a "massive object" that has a strong gravitational pull---just by simply being in the vicinity of a bunch of particles, you have a strong gravitational pull?
A lotta little forces added together equals one big force.
Ok, so how does this collection of particles have 1 big gravitational pull? It just has a billion "little pulls" -- a bunch of little dimples, not one big huge dip.
Ok, this really shouldn't be that hard. Imagine you had 100 rubber bands that each exerted a 1 lb force on an object. What's the total force?

Or rather, in your dimples analogy, if the dimples are really close together, you start getting dimples on top of dimples, making them combine to form one big one. Have you ever had poison ivy...?
 
Ok, so how does this collection of particles have 1 big gravitational pull? It just has a billion "little pulls" -- a bunch of little dimples, not one big huge dip.

Have you ever actually done this? That is, take a number of small masses: shot, say, and place it on a rubber sheet.

Each shot makes a little dimple, yes, but when two are close together, you DON'T have the two dimples coming up level with the rest of the sheet between them: what happens is you get one, larger, dimple. All of the "dimples" (distortions in space-time) combine to form one large dimple.
 
comparing a flat solar panel of area 2π r² and a hemisphere of the same area, the hemispherical solar panel would only occupy the area π r² of while the flat panel would occupy an entire 2π r² of land. wouldn't the hemispherical version have the same area of panel exposed to the sun, occupy less land space and can therefore increase the number of panels one land can have fitted? this would increase the power output proportionally as well. when I searched it up I wasn't satisfied with...
I think it's easist first to watch a short vidio clip I find these videos very relaxing to watch .. I got to thinking is this being done in the most efficient way? The sand has to be suspended in the water to move it to the outlet ... The faster the water , the more turbulance and the sand stays suspended, so it seems to me the rule of thumb is the hose be aimed towards the outlet at all times .. Many times the workers hit the sand directly which will greatly reduce the water...
Back
Top