UFO Sighting: Is It Real or Imaginary?

  • Thread starter Grizzlycomet
  • Start date
  • Tags
    Imaginary
In summary, the conversation is discussing a sighting of a moving object in the sky that appeared to have unusual movements. The person asking the question is wondering if it could be a UFO, while another person suggests it could be a satellite reflecting sunlight. They discuss the location and time of the sighting, and the possibility of other satellites being seen in the area. The conversation ends with the person who originally saw the object stating that it was a single object that was visible for only a short period of time.
  • #1
Grizzlycomet
43
0
I was outside just now, stargazing with my 10x40 binoculars, as it is an exceptionally clear and beautiful night here today. I was looking east, at Andromeda, when I spotted a moving object. It's apparent size and magnitude was about that of the stars behind. I follow it in my binoculars while it traveled towards the horizon, and in a northernly direction for maybe 30 seconds. At this point, it made a 180 degree turn, now heading up from the horizon and in a southernly direction. After another 20 seconds or so, it again made a sharp turn, now heading straight north parallell to the horizon. Now it started fading rapidly, and after a short while, maybe like 10 seconds, it was too faint for me to keep tracking it.
Am I seeing a UFO :confused:
Or does anyone have a more down-to-earth solution?
 
Astronomy news on Phys.org
  • #2
Hard to account for such a strange path.

Usually, the 'stars' you see moving too rapidly to be stars are satellites. Just after sunset, the sun can reflect off of them, making them visible to you.

You don't give your location very precisely or the exact time you saw them. However, if the location were Oslo (biggest city I know of in Norway, therefore the best chance of being right), two reasonably bright satellites could have been seen tonight.

An old Russian rocket body should have risen in the southwest at 10:52, hit its maximum elevation of 70 degrees in ESE direction at 10:58, and set in the NE at at 11:03 (man you guys have late sunsets up there).

An American Lacrosse satellite should have risen in the SW at 10:58, hit its max elevation of 75 degrees in the SE at 11:03 and set to the NE at 11:08.

Typically, satellites are not visible for the entire time they are above the horizon - it depends on the angle between the Sun-satellite-and you, plus the satellite's orientation sometimes. The satellite would almost certainly be visible at its max elevation, though.

If you're out of the city, and have binoculars there's quite a few others you could have seen, some of which would cross each other while still visible.

Check http://www.heavens-above.com/

They post schedules for most visible satellites.
 
  • #3
I'm in a town called Tønsberg. It's a bit south of Oslo, but not too far so the times shuld not be too far off. The time of the sighting was not too long before I made my post, a little before 2 am local time. The satellites you mention had the right kind of directions, but they had the wrong timing (assuming you gave times in local time, CET), also they were there for spans of ten minutes. The object I saw was visible for only one, certainly no more than one and a half minute. I am familiar with heavens-above, I use it regularly. I searched it for possible matches immideately after the sighting, but couldn't find any satisfactory results. Not that any of the other satellites I have seen carried out these kind of maneuvers in any case. As to satellites crossing each other's paths, I am certain I was following a single object all along, as I had it in view at all times.
 

1. What evidence is there to support the existence of UFO sightings?

There have been numerous eyewitness accounts, photographs, and videos of unexplained flying objects that cannot be identified as any known aircraft or natural phenomenon. In addition, there have been government documents released that suggest the existence of UFOs.

2. Can UFO sightings be explained by other factors?

While many sightings cannot be explained by conventional means, some can be attributed to natural phenomena such as weather balloons, meteors, or military exercises. Additionally, some sightings may be hoaxes or misidentified objects.

3. What is the scientific community's stance on UFO sightings?

The scientific community generally remains skeptical of UFO sightings due to the lack of concrete evidence and the prevalence of hoaxes. However, there are some scientists who believe that further investigation into the phenomenon is warranted.

4. Are there any possible explanations for the technology behind UFOs?

Some theories suggest that UFOs could be advanced aircraft or spacecraft developed by other countries or even extraterrestrial civilizations. However, there is currently no concrete evidence to support these claims.

5. What should be done to further investigate UFO sightings?

Many scientists believe that further research and investigation into UFO sightings should be conducted using rigorous scientific methods and technologies. This could include analyzing physical evidence, conducting controlled experiments, and utilizing advanced imaging and detection techniques.

Similar threads

  • Astronomy and Astrophysics
Replies
1
Views
895
Replies
5
Views
944
Replies
10
Views
957
  • Special and General Relativity
2
Replies
60
Views
3K
  • Differential Equations
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • General Discussion
Replies
4
Views
7K
  • Special and General Relativity
3
Replies
84
Views
5K
  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
13
Views
1K
Replies
14
Views
5K
Replies
13
Views
2K
Back
Top