What distinguishes ΔPE, PE, and PEaverage in oscillating systems?

AI Thread Summary
ΔPE represents the change in potential energy between two points in an oscillating system, indicating the potential to do work. Instantaneous potential energy (PE) is measured at a specific moment in the oscillation and can vary based on the chosen coordinate system. PEaverage is the mean potential energy over a complete oscillation, which is particularly useful when considering energy loss due to dissipation. In systems like spring-mass or Lennard-Jones potentials, PE is typically referenced from a defined zero point, such as the unstretched position or infinity. Understanding these distinctions is crucial for analyzing energy dynamics in oscillating systems.
romantichero7
Messages
4
Reaction score
0
1. With respect to any oscillating system, what is the difference between ΔPE, PE, and PEaverage?

Homework Equations


----

The Attempt at a Solution


Hi all. I want to preface this by saying that we have been discussing the Lennard-Jones potential and particle theory in class recently, after learning spring-mass potential energy dynamics.

So I was thinking, ΔPE is the change in potential energy from some initial point to some final point.. so it is really a measure of CHANGE in the potential to do work...

I was thinking that plain PE is like the instantaneous potential energy at a specific point in the oscillation.. and it is often arbitrary based on where we set our coordinate system.

I struggle with PEaverage because it is not a term we have used in class before; but my attempt is that it is just the mean value of potential energy over some stretch of time.

What do you guys think?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
yes, ΔPE is some particular change, as the object moves to a new location.
PE for a spring-with-mass system is usually measured from the spring-not-stretched location, since PE=0 there (and is always positive).
PE for an atom-style potential (L.Jones, et.al) are always measured from infinity, since PE=0 there.
PE average is most convenient to average over one oscillation ... they're all the same unless there is dissipation (friction),
but if there IS Energy loss to somewhere, you can define ΔE per oscillation (or Q = Eaverage/ΔE per osc)
In L.Jones shallow well, the PEaverage is a bit above the local minimum in that well, due to thermal Energy.

Have any specific questions or doubts?
 
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanged mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top