What do Rcm and Rcmob represent in this fluid mechanics problem?

AI Thread Summary
In the fluid mechanics problem, Rcm represents the distance from the rotation axis to the center of mass of the displaced fluid, while Rcmob is the distance to the center of mass of the object. The pressure differential in the fluid is derived as dp=ρω²r'dr', leading to the expression for pressure at a distance r≥ro as p=po+ρω²(r²-ro²)/2. The net horizontal force on the object is given by ρVω²Rcm, and the object's movement is determined by the relationship between ρRcm and ρobRcmob. Understanding these terms is crucial for solving the problem, particularly in visualizing the dynamics of the fluid and the object in the ultracentrifuge.
iitjee10
Messages
56
Reaction score
0
Q2. An incompressible fluid with density ρ is in a horizontal test tube of inner cross-sectional area A. The test tube spins in a horizontal circle in an ultracentrifuge at an angular speed ω. Gravitational forces are negligible. Consider a volume element of the fluid of area A and thickness dr' at a distance r' from the rotation axis. The pressure on its inner surface is p and outer surface is p+dp.
(a) Show that dp=ρω2r'dr'.
(b) If the surface of the fluid is at a radius ro where the pressure is po, show that the pressure p at a distance r≥ro is p=po+ρω2(r2-ro2)/2.
(c) An object of volume V and density ρob has its centre of mass at a distance Rcmob from the axis. Show that the net horizontal force on the object is ρVω2Rcm, where Rcm is the distance from the axis to the center of mass of the displaced fluid.
(d) Explain why the object will move inward if ρRcmobRcmob and outward if ρRcmobRcmob.
(e) For small objects of uniform density, Rcm = Rcmob. What happens to a mixture of small objects of this kind with different densities in an unltracentrifuge?

This was a problem given in Sears and Zemansky (University Physics)

I have solved parts (a) and (b) of this problem completely. But I could not understand (rather visualise) what Rcm, and Rcmob stand for so was unable to proceed further.

Any help in visualising these terms would be of a great help
 
Physics news on Phys.org
iitjee10 said:
(c) An object of volume V and density ρob has its centre of mass at a distance Rcmob from the axis. Show that the net horizontal force on the object is ρVω2Rcm, where Rcm is the distance from the axis to the center of mass of the displaced fluid.
(d) Explain why the object will move inward if ρRcmobRcmob and outward if ρRcmobRcmob.
(e) For small objects of uniform density, Rcm = Rcmob. What happens to a mixture of small objects of this kind with different densities in an unltracentrifuge?

But I could not understand (rather visualise) what Rcm, and Rcmob stand for so was unable to proceed further.

Hi iitjee10! :smile:

It's not clear, but I think ρob is not constant (but ρ, the density of the fluid, is) …

so ρob = massob/V.

So the c.o.m. of the object is not at the centroid (where the c.o.m. of the displaced fluid would have been). :smile:
 
The density of the object has to be constant otherwise the problem here will become hopelessly complicated. This is what I think.
 
Anyone?
 
iitjee10 said:
But I could not understand (rather visualise) what Rcm, and Rcmob stand for so was unable to proceed further.
As explained in the problem statement, one is the distance to the center of mass of the displaced fluid while the other is the distance to the center of mass of the object. They are being very precise and picky!
iitjee10 said:
The density of the object has to be constant otherwise the problem here will become hopelessly complicated. This is what I think.
Not really. For example, part C really has nothing to do with the density of the object, just the force on it from the surrounding fluid.
 
I have recently been really interested in the derivation of Hamiltons Principle. On my research I found that with the term ##m \cdot \frac{d}{dt} (\frac{dr}{dt} \cdot \delta r) = 0## (1) one may derivate ##\delta \int (T - V) dt = 0## (2). The derivation itself I understood quiet good, but what I don't understand is where the equation (1) came from, because in my research it was just given and not derived from anywhere. Does anybody know where (1) comes from or why from it the...
Back
Top