I What do you call a parallelepiped that isn't a cube?

  • I
  • Thread starter Thread starter udtsith
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Cube
AI Thread Summary
A parallelepiped that isn't a cube, rectangle, or rhombohedron may be best described as an "oblique parallelepiped" to clarify its tilted nature. Some suggest using adjectives like "non-rectangular parallelepiped" to exclude square and rectangular faces. The discussion highlights that parallelepipeds are a subset of prisms, but a specific term for non-standard forms may not exist due to limited practical need. Ultimately, using descriptive language is necessary to convey the intended shape accurately. Clear terminology is essential for effective communication in geometry.
udtsith
Messages
53
Reaction score
1
I was curious what you would call a parallelepiped that isn't a cube and isn't a rectangle and isn't just a rhombohedron? Here is my problem...I need to describe an oblique/tilted parallelepiped but if I just say 'parallelepiped' that would include a cube or rectangle (which I am not referring to). Should I just say oblique parallelepiped? Thank you!
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
jedishrfu said:
I think parallelepipeds are a subset of Prisms. I need a subset of a parallelepiped. But thank you.
 
Here's some more definitions to consider:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Prismatoid

It looks like though you'll have to use some adjective in front of parallelepiped to describe what you mean like perhaps a non-rectangular parallelepiped which excludes square and rectangular faces.

You quest is similar to describing the set of real numbers without integers. There may be no proper term for it as there is no obvious need to define it.
 
Thread 'Video on imaginary numbers and some queries'
Hi, I was watching the following video. I found some points confusing. Could you please help me to understand the gaps? Thanks, in advance! Question 1: Around 4:22, the video says the following. So for those mathematicians, negative numbers didn't exist. You could subtract, that is find the difference between two positive quantities, but you couldn't have a negative answer or negative coefficients. Mathematicians were so averse to negative numbers that there was no single quadratic...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Thread 'Unit Circle Double Angle Derivations'
Here I made a terrible mistake of assuming this to be an equilateral triangle and set 2sinx=1 => x=pi/6. Although this did derive the double angle formulas it also led into a terrible mess trying to find all the combinations of sides. I must have been tired and just assumed 6x=180 and 2sinx=1. By that time, I was so mindset that I nearly scolded a person for even saying 90-x. I wonder if this is a case of biased observation that seeks to dis credit me like Jesus of Nazareth since in reality...
Back
Top