What Do You Call the Quantity When You Multiply Light Flux by Detector Area?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Mu naught
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
Multiplying light flux by the area of a detector yields a quantity measured in watts, which is technically considered power. However, the discussion seeks the correct term for this quantity, distinguishing it from luminosity, which refers to the total energy emitted by an object. The conversation suggests that the term "radiant flux" may be more appropriate, as it describes the energy per unit area per second detected. This highlights the difference between total emitted energy and the energy received by a specific detector area. The focus remains on accurately defining the measurement related to light detection.
Mu naught
Messages
208
Reaction score
2
If you take the Flux of a light source and multiple by the area of your detector you are left with a quantity in units of only watts.

Now this is technically "power", but what is the correct term for this quantity?
 
Astronomy news on Phys.org
Mu naught said:
If you take the Flux of a light source and multiple by the area of your detector you are left with a quantity in units of only watts.

Now this is technically "power", but what is the correct term for this quantity?

Are you talking about luminosity?

Luminosity is a function of the amount of light output (brightness or flux) per given unit of surface area multiplied by the total surface area.L= b*((d^2)*pi*4)

L=luminosity (watts)
b=brightness or flux ("watts/meters^2")
d=diameter of star (meters)
((d^2)*pi*4)=surface area (meters^2)

It's basically the surface area (m^2) of the sphere multiplied by the brightness per unit of area. Which finds the total output (commonly shown in the form of watts.).
 
Last edited:
No, because luminosity describes the total amount of energy emitted by an object.

I'm talking about multiplying the apparent brightness of an object by the area of a detector to get the total amount of energy per second falling on that detector. I believe there is a certain term for this that is not "power" but I don't know what that term is.
 
I think you're talking about "radiant flux" if you are talking about the amount per surface area unit per second observed by a detector.
 
Publication: Redox-driven mineral and organic associations in Jezero Crater, Mars Article: NASA Says Mars Rover Discovered Potential Biosignature Last Year Press conference The ~100 authors don't find a good way this could have formed without life, but also can't rule it out. Now that they have shared their findings with the larger community someone else might find an explanation - or maybe it was actually made by life.
TL;DR Summary: In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect alien signals, it will further expand the radius of the so-called silence (or rather, radio silence) of the Universe. Is there any sense in this or is blissful ignorance better? In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect...
This thread is dedicated to the beauty and awesomeness of our Universe. If you feel like it, please share video clips and photos (or nice animations) of space and objects in space in this thread. Your posts, clips and photos may by all means include scientific information; that does not make it less beautiful to me (n.b. the posts must of course comply with the PF guidelines, i.e. regarding science, only mainstream science is allowed, fringe/pseudoscience is not allowed). n.b. I start this...
Back
Top