What do you think of this paper?

In summary, this paper appears to be well-researched and provides a comprehensive analysis of the topic at hand. The author's arguments are supported by strong evidence and the writing is clear and concise. However, some areas could benefit from further elaboration or explanation. Overall, this paper presents a thought-provoking perspective on the subject and is a valuable contribution to the field.
  • #1
John Luis
I have recently read a paper called "Engineering of Gravity and Time" for an undergraduate student. It contains a theory of gravity and time depending on rotation.
Well.., I think it looks quiet percussive. However, fairly, it contains some worthwhile ideas, especially it answers some elementary questions that current theories can not such as "why is gravity much weaker than other forces?". It recommends an experiment at the end too.
So.., I wish you read it and tell me what you think, please.

Available at
<< Link removed.>>

Thanks.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
Complete hogwash.

"Earth attracts Newton’s apple and not vice versa." False.
 
  • Like
Likes DrClaude
  • #3
Hornbein said:
Complete hogwash.

"Earth attracts Newton’s apple and not vice versa." False.

This is true with respect to his theory "rotation" because Earth rotates but the apple does not ( Eq. 1). However, false with respect to relativity.
 
  • #4
The link given is not to an acceptable source as per PF rules.

Thread closed.
 
  • Like
Likes davenn

What do you think of this paper?

1. Do you think the research methods used in this paper are appropriate?

As a scientist, I cannot form an opinion on the research methods used in a paper without thoroughly reviewing and analyzing them. It is important to consider the validity and reliability of the methods used in order to draw accurate conclusions from the research.

What do you think of this paper?

2. Are the results presented in this paper significant?

As a scientist, I cannot determine the significance of the results without examining the data and statistical analysis used. It is important to critically evaluate the results to ensure they are not due to chance or bias.

What do you think of this paper?

3. Are the conclusions drawn in this paper supported by the evidence presented?

As a scientist, I cannot determine the validity of the conclusions drawn without examining the evidence presented. It is important to critically evaluate the evidence and ensure that it supports the conclusions made.

What do you think of this paper?

4. Do you think this paper adds to the current knowledge in the field?

As a scientist, I cannot make a judgement on the contribution of a paper to the current knowledge in the field without thoroughly reviewing and comparing it to existing literature. It is important to consider the novelty and significance of the findings in relation to previous research.

What do you think of this paper?

5. Do you have any suggestions for improvement on this paper?

As a scientist, I may have suggestions for improvement on a paper after thoroughly reviewing it. This may include suggestions for different research methods, data analysis techniques, or areas for further research. However, it is important to provide constructive criticism and not dismiss the paper entirely.

Similar threads

I Witten’s paper: "A Note On The Canonical Formalism for Gravity" LQG
    • Beyond the Standard Models
Replies
13
Views
2K
Should the public know what you are thinking and concluding?
    • General Discussion
Replies
10
Views
1K
Other Name omitted from Professor's research paper- What should I do?
    • STEM Academic Advising
Replies
25
Views
2K
Print vs. Etext: Which do you prefer?
    • General Discussion
Replies
7
Views
1K
I Two recent tests of loop quantum gravity theory
    • Beyond the Standard Models
Replies
9
Views
496
Focus all of your ire on me, if you would
    • General Discussion
Replies
4
Views
666
Discussion on the science-literature relationship and more
    • General Discussion
Replies
14
Views
918
I Can Core Theory Be Derived From Nine Lines?
    • Beyond the Standard Models
Replies
6
Views
2K
Is math really that important to do physics?
    • STEM Academic Advising
2
Replies
60
Views
3K
A "Monstrous Higgs and Leech Spacetime"
    • Beyond the Standard Models
Replies
0
Views
1K

Hot Threads

Recent Insights

Back
Top