What does a path integral measure in complex analysis?

AI Thread Summary
A path integral in complex analysis measures the total contribution of a function along a specific path, rather than the length or area of that path. It accounts for the direction and distance between starting and ending points, reflecting the overall effect of the function as it varies along the curve. This integral does not track the specific path taken or the speed of travel, but rather aggregates small contributions from the function at each point along the path. Understanding path integrals involves recognizing them as summations of these contributions, which become more precise with finer subdivisions. Mastery of this concept is essential for navigating complex analysis effectively.
redshift
Messages
53
Reaction score
0
What exactly does a path integral measure? Is it area between the ends/bounds of the line? Or is it the length of the line? Just started complex analysis and am comletely confused by this.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
redshift said:
What exactly does a path integral measure? Is it area between the ends/bounds of the line? Or is it the length of the line? Just started complex analysis and am comletely confused by this.

It's not the length, you can think of the dz as keeping track of direction and distance you move. The integral \int_{\gamma}dz along a path z=\gamma(t),\ t\in\[a,b\] is simply \int_{a}^{b}\gamma '(t)dt=\gamma(b)-\gamma(a) so you actually get the distance and direction your end point is from your start point, not the total distance you've travelled. This integral doesn't even keep track of how the path made it from start to finish, nor how fast it went.
 


A path integral is a mathematical tool used to calculate the value of a function along a specific path or curve. It is commonly used in calculus, physics, and other fields to solve problems involving motion, optimization, and probability.

The path integral measures the total contribution of a function over a given path or curve. It does not specifically measure the area or length of the line, but rather the overall effect of the function along that path. In other words, it takes into account the changes in the function as it moves along the path, rather than just the starting and ending points.

To better understand this, let's use an example. Imagine you are driving a car along a winding road. The path integral would measure the total distance traveled, taking into account any curves or turns in the road. It would not just measure the straight-line distance between the starting and ending points.

Similarly, in complex analysis, the path integral measures the total effect of a complex-valued function along a specific path in the complex plane. It takes into account the changes in the function as it moves along the path, rather than just the values at the starting and ending points.

I understand that this concept can be confusing, especially when just starting to learn about complex analysis. It may help to think of the path integral as a summation of small contributions along the path, with each contribution taking into account the changes in the function at that point. As the number of contributions becomes infinitely small, the path integral becomes more accurate.

I hope this explanation helps to clarify the concept of path integrals for you. Keep practicing and seeking out resources to deepen your understanding. Complex analysis can be challenging, but with patience and perseverance, you will grasp these concepts.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top