What does C^r mean for a function of several variables?

AI Thread Summary
C^r for functions of several variables indicates that all partial derivatives, both mixed and unmixed, of order r must be continuous. This contrasts with the definition for functions of one variable, which focuses solely on the continuity of the rth derivative. The discussion confirms that the definition holds true across multiple variables. Understanding this distinction is crucial for analyzing the smoothness of multivariable functions. Overall, C^r signifies a higher level of continuity for derivatives in multivariable calculus.
quasar987
Science Advisor
Homework Helper
Gold Member
Messages
4,796
Reaction score
32
Wiki and mathworld only talk about C^r for functions of one variables, saying C^r is the space of function with and rth derivative that is continuous. But for a function of several variables to be C^r means that all its partial derivatives (mixed and not mixed) of order r are continuous, correct?
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Yes. Tht is correct.
 
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagorus'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...
Back
Top