What Does Fd Represent in Net Force Calculations?

AI Thread Summary
In net force calculations, Fd is not a standard term and its meaning can vary based on context. The discussion suggests that Fd could represent a downward force, but clarification is needed since the terms Fa (applied force) and Ff (frictional force) are more commonly understood. Participants emphasize the importance of providing the complete problem for accurate assistance. Without additional details, it is challenging to determine the exact nature of Fd. Overall, more context is essential for a precise interpretation of the forces involved.
reganw
Messages
19
Reaction score
0
I'm trying to calculate the acceleration of an object but first I need to calculate the net force. For this question we were told Fnet = Fa-Fd-Ff.. just wondering what Fd is?

Thank you in advance.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
not ! calculate net force (N) how can including the work done (J).:smile:

You should check out your question purposely that what kind of the force(Fd) is.
 
xiaoB said:
not ! calculate net force (N) how can including the work done (J).:smile:

You should check out your question purposely that what kind of the force(Fd) is.

hmm.. I just don't know what it could be.. there's Fn, Fa, Ff, Fg all in the question but I don't know where the Fd comes from.. maybe Fdown?
 
Why don't you post the actual question, in it's entirety?
 
Redbelly98 said:
Why don't you post the actual question, in it's entirety?

It's a simulation, everything can be altered so there isn't really a question to post. And I can't post the link to it because it's an internal website.
 
We have no information other than there is an object with 3 forces acting on it, and these forces are to be labeled Fa, Fd, and Ff. Is there really nothing else you can tell us about the problem?

Ff usually means a frictional force. But Fa and Fd do not have a usual definition that I am aware of, though Fa might be used for an applied force. But here I am only guessing at the things you already know, but have neglected to tell us. I'm afraid that without more information, it is unlikely that we can help out.
 
Last edited:
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top