B What Does It Mean For A Force To Act On A Particle?

iScience
Messages
466
Reaction score
5
I know this is kind of a dumb question but please forgive me it's been awhile.

Is it enough for a particle to merely "feel" an external force F to state that "F is acting on the particle"?
ie if the particle was confined in a potential well and experiences F but does not move.

or does $$\vec{F} \cdot d\vec{s}$$ have to be non-zero? ie does force have to do work on the particle to state that "F is acting on the particle"?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Yes, I would say that a force 'acts' on a particle even if it doesn't move. It still affects the equilibrium state, meaning that the energy level, orbit, or whatever of the particle and its surrounding environment is different when the force is applied versus when it is not applied. Force example, if you place a hydrogen atom in a magnetic field the atomic energy levels shift slightly even though the electron is still in a stationary state and isn't being ripped from its atom and accelerated away.
 
  • Like
Likes Dale
Drakkith said:
Yes, I would say that a force 'acts' on a particle even if it doesn't move. It still affects the equilibrium state, meaning that the energy level, orbit, or whatever of the particle and its surrounding environment is different when the force is applied versus when it is not applied. Force example, if you place a hydrogen atom in a magnetic field the atomic energy levels shift slightly even though the electron is still in a stationary state and isn't being ripped from its atom and accelerated away.

Thank you!
 
Another simple example: hang a heavy body at the roof with an elastic thread; at equilibrium you can verify and measure the existence of the thread's force on the body with its elongation; cut the thread and the body falls down.

--
lightarrow
 
Toponium is a hadron which is the bound state of a valance top quark and a valance antitop quark. Oversimplified presentations often state that top quarks don't form hadrons, because they decay to bottom quarks extremely rapidly after they are created, leaving no time to form a hadron. And, the vast majority of the time, this is true. But, the lifetime of a top quark is only an average lifetime. Sometimes it decays faster and sometimes it decays slower. In the highly improbable case that...
I'm following this paper by Kitaev on SL(2,R) representations and I'm having a problem in the normalization of the continuous eigenfunctions (eqs. (67)-(70)), which satisfy \langle f_s | f_{s'} \rangle = \int_{0}^{1} \frac{2}{(1-u)^2} f_s(u)^* f_{s'}(u) \, du. \tag{67} The singular contribution of the integral arises at the endpoint u=1 of the integral, and in the limit u \to 1, the function f_s(u) takes on the form f_s(u) \approx a_s (1-u)^{1/2 + i s} + a_s^* (1-u)^{1/2 - i s}. \tag{70}...
Back
Top