What does it mean that inner product is bilinear and non-singular

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around the properties of an inner product defined in the context of Poincaré duality and cohomology groups, specifically focusing on the bilinearity and non-singularity of the product defined as \(\left\langle \omega, \eta\right\rangle \equiv \int_{M}\omega \wedge \eta\). Participants seek clarification on these concepts and their implications.

Discussion Character

  • Conceptual clarification, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants explore the definition of bilinearity and non-singularity, with some attempting to understand the implications of these properties in the context of the inner product. Questions arise regarding the meaning of constants in the bilinear function and the independence of the wedge product from the choice of representatives.

Discussion Status

The discussion is active, with participants sharing definitions and seeking further understanding. Some have begun to grasp the concepts, while others continue to question specific aspects of the definitions and their applications. There is no explicit consensus yet, but productive dialogue is occurring.

Contextual Notes

Participants are working within the constraints of the definitions provided in their textbooks and are grappling with the implications of these definitions in their specific mathematical context.

rayman123
Messages
138
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Hello everyone! I am reading abour Poincares duality between 2 cohomology groups and here comes an inner product defined as

[itex]\left\langle \omega, \eta\right\rangle \equiv \int_{M}\omega \wedge \eta[/itex]

and then the author of my book says ''The product is bilinear and non-singular'' that is if [tex]\omega\neq 0[/tex] or [itex]\eta \neq 0[/tex] , [itex]\left\langle \omega, \eta\right\rangle [/tex] cannot vanish identically...<br /> can someone please explain me this concept, what does it mean bilinear and non-singular??<br /> <br /> Thank you![/itex][/itex]
 
Physics news on Phys.org
A function, f(u, v), is "bilinear" if and only if f(au+ bw,v)= af(u, v)+ bf(w,v) and f(u, av+ bw)= af(u,v)+ bf(u,w).

Non-singular simply means that f(u,v) is not 0 for all u and v.
 
HallsofIvy said:
A function, f(u, v), is "bilinear" if and only if f(au+ bw,v)= af(u, v)+ bf(w,v) and f(u, av+ bw)= af(u,v)+ bf(u,w).

okej so f is a function of 2 variables, and are a and b some constants? I am not sure If I understand this equation...
Oh now I think I am getting it
 
Last edited:
I have another question about the very same wedge product

in my book it is written
[tex][\omega \wedge \eta][/itex] is independent of the choice of the representatives of [tex][\omega][/tex] and [itex][\eta][/itex][/tex][itex]. For example if we take [itex]\omega^{'}=\omega+d\psi[/tex] instead of [itex]\omega[/tex] we have<br /> <br /> [itex][\omega^{'}\wedge \eta]\equiv [(\omega+d\psi)\wedge \eta]=[\omega\wedge \eta+d(\psi\wedge \eta)]=[\omega\wedge \eta][/tex]<br /> <br /> <br /> then the term [tex]d(\psi\wedge \eta)=0[/tex] but why<br /> I checked the definition for the wedge product [tex]d(\omega\wedge \eta)=(d\omega)\wedge \eta+ (-)^{q}\omega\wedge (d\eta)[/tex] where [itex]\omega\in \Omega^{q}(M)[/tex] and [itex]d\omega\in \Omega^{q+1}(M)[/tex]<br /> <br /> <br /> But I cannot see it giving me 0...Could you show it to me how did they get [tex]d(\psi\wedge \eta)=0[/tex][/itex][/itex][/itex][/itex][/itex][/itex]
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
1K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K