What does it mean to have a charge?

  • Thread starter Thread starter TheRingBarer
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Charge Mean
AI Thread Summary
Having a charge refers to a fundamental property of objects that influences their interactions, particularly in electrostatics. Electrons repel other negatively charged particles due to the nature of electric forces, which can be difficult to conceptualize compared to other properties like mass or volume. The discussion suggests that while Maxwell's equations can be derived from theoretical frameworks, such as additional spatial dimensions, these ideas remain speculative. In physics, the focus shifts from "Why" to "What," as basic properties are defined by their interactions rather than deeper explanations. Ultimately, understanding charge may lead to uncovering more fundamental phenomena, but the quest for a "Why" remains elusive.
TheRingBarer
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
I understand where is comes from and its effects on other things that have an electrostatic charge, but what does it mean to have a charge? Why do electrons repel other -ve (sub) atomic particles? It's really not something I find tangible. :)
 
Physics news on Phys.org


It's just a property of objects, as are mass, volume, and so on. It's just a little more ... hard to imagine than those.

If I remember correctly, we can derive Maxwell's equations from assuming another spatial dimension and taking charge to be the component of momentum in that dimension or something of the sort, but I think for now that's considered in the realm of other non-provable (or, rather, non-disprovable) theories such as string theory.
 


In the end, the best we can do with all basic properties is to define them by their interactions with other basic properties. "Why" is not a useful question, particularly not in physics. Usually when somebody asks "Why" in a science context the phenomenon is then described in terms of more basic phenomenon. Ex - Why is the sky blue? Because of refraction. Thats is fine, but continue that line of questioning and you will eventually hit a wall when you reach basic phenomenon. Once you get to basic phenomenon "Why" no longer makes sense to ask and "What" is the better way to ask the question.

If/when we do have an answer to "Why charge?" then that would imply we have more basic phenomena to appeal too. Basic phenomena which would in turn resist any question of "Why?".
 
Thread 'Motional EMF in Faraday disc, co-rotating magnet axial mean flux'
So here is the motional EMF formula. Now I understand the standard Faraday paradox that an axis symmetric field source (like a speaker motor ring magnet) has a magnetic field that is frame invariant under rotation around axis of symmetry. The field is static whether you rotate the magnet or not. So far so good. What puzzles me is this , there is a term average magnetic flux or "azimuthal mean" , this term describes the average magnetic field through the area swept by the rotating Faraday...
It may be shown from the equations of electromagnetism, by James Clerk Maxwell in the 1860’s, that the speed of light in the vacuum of free space is related to electric permittivity (ϵ) and magnetic permeability (μ) by the equation: c=1/√( μ ϵ ) . This value is a constant for the vacuum of free space and is independent of the motion of the observer. It was this fact, in part, that led Albert Einstein to Special Relativity.
Back
Top