What does it mean when a circuit has two voltages?

  • Thread starter Thread starter magisbladius
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Circuit Mean
AI Thread Summary
A circuit with two voltages can include negative values, which indicate a voltage below the reference point, typically ground. The interpretation of a negative voltage is straightforward; it represents a potential difference that can be calculated similarly to positive voltages. Voltages do not need to be symmetric; for example, a circuit can have +9V and -3V, as long as the voltage difference is accurately represented. The choice of negative voltages can enhance circuit functionality, as seen in historical applications like HP mini computers. Ultimately, voltage measurements are relative, and the essential factor is the potential difference across components.
magisbladius
Messages
7
Reaction score
0
(Sorry for the bad title wording.)

I attached a picture of what I mean. Those are two points, each attached to a different voltage source. I'm used to seeing something like +9 [V] to 0 [V].

1) How am I supposed to interpret a circuit with a -X [V], where X = any positive integer, at the end?

2) Why would you use the negative in the first place?

3) Could the values for the circuit be +9 to -3, or does it have to be symmetric like +9 to -9?
 

Attachments

  • circuit.jpg
    circuit.jpg
    4.4 KB · Views: 365
Physics news on Phys.org
Voltages are only a relative measurement You can't say something is 9V unless you say 9V measured against something - you can only talk about a voltage difference across a component.
Normally if there is only a single voltage you assume the other side is at 0v and this is the potential of Earth.
You can calculate anything in this circuit by working out the voltage difference, having +9V on one side of a component and -9V on the other is exactly the same as having +18V on one side and 0 on the other, or +12V and -6V.

Think of it like a problem in mechanics, it doesn't matter what you call 0 height, everythign else works out the same.
 
If your diagram is symmetric, for simplicity, think of a ground attached to both vertical portions of the circuit at the center...say a ground connection in the middle of each.

Those voltages could have any values depending on the circuit elements and voltage or current sources. A mix of voltage and current sources, together with different circuit elements, can also cause different sign voltages...
 
Last edited:
magisbladius said:
(Sorry for the bad title wording.)

I attached a picture of what I mean. Those are two points, each attached to a different voltage source. I'm used to seeing something like +9 [V] to 0 [V].

1) How am I supposed to interpret a circuit with a -X [V], where X = any positive integer, at the end?

2) Why would you use the negative in the first place?

3) Could the values for the circuit be +9 to -3, or does it have to be symmetric like +9 to -9?

1) Interpret it as a negative voltage. So in your picture, the voltage across the device would be 9 V - (-9 V) = 18 volts. Calculate accordingly.

2) 0 Volts is usually taken as "ground". It is just a reference potential. Some voltages are below it, some above.

3) Yes, it can be +9 V to -3 V, and it need not be symmetric. It just needs to be what it is.
 
As an actual example, HP mini computers of the 1970's used +5 and -2 volts for their TTL logic. Switching rates were a bit faster due to the extra 2 volts, and short to ground (0 volts) or breaks in circuits could be detected more easily.
 
+9v and -9v is just the mentioning the electric potential difference. In that circuit the potential difference is 18V. It can be -3 or whatever you like it. It's just taking relative to the neutral or ground which is taken as 0V.
 
Thread 'Motional EMF in Faraday disc, co-rotating magnet axial mean flux'
So here is the motional EMF formula. Now I understand the standard Faraday paradox that an axis symmetric field source (like a speaker motor ring magnet) has a magnetic field that is frame invariant under rotation around axis of symmetry. The field is static whether you rotate the magnet or not. So far so good. What puzzles me is this , there is a term average magnetic flux or "azimuthal mean" , this term describes the average magnetic field through the area swept by the rotating Faraday...
It may be shown from the equations of electromagnetism, by James Clerk Maxwell in the 1860’s, that the speed of light in the vacuum of free space is related to electric permittivity (ϵ) and magnetic permeability (μ) by the equation: c=1/√( μ ϵ ) . This value is a constant for the vacuum of free space and is independent of the motion of the observer. It was this fact, in part, that led Albert Einstein to Special Relativity.
Back
Top