What Does John A. Wheeler's 'Participatory Principle' Mean for Modern Cosmology?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Belzy
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Principle
AI Thread Summary
John A. Wheeler's "Participatory Principle" suggests that observers are integral to the universe's existence, implying that without observation, the universe's fundamental components could not exist. This principle emphasizes the role of observer-participancy in shaping reality, rooted in quantum mechanics. Its application to modern cosmology raises philosophical questions about the nature of observation and reality, highlighting the limitations of our understanding. While it provides a framework for considering observational constraints, it does not necessarily lead to definitive answers in cosmological studies. Ultimately, the principle invites deeper exploration of the relationship between observation and the universe.
Belzy
Messages
33
Reaction score
0
What did John A. Wheeler mean when he said "Participatory principle. According to it we could not even imagine a universe that did not somewhere and for some stretch of time contain observers because the very building materials of the universe are these acts of observer-participancy. You wouldn't have the stuff out of which to build the universe otherwise. This participatory principle takes for its foundation the absolutely central point of the quantum."?

Central point of the quantum?

How if at all can we apply this principle to modern Cosmology?
 
Space news on Phys.org
Philosophy is the short answer. Wheeler merely acknowledges observational constraints. This is a valid way of looking at the big picture, which does not necessarily result in a big answer.
 
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Recombination_(cosmology) Was a matter density right after the decoupling low enough to consider the vacuum as the actual vacuum, and not the medium through which the light propagates with the speed lower than ##({\epsilon_0\mu_0})^{-1/2}##? I'm asking this in context of the calculation of the observable universe radius, where the time integral of the inverse of the scale factor is multiplied by the constant speed of light ##c##.
The formal paper is here. The Rutgers University news has published a story about an image being closely examined at their New Brunswick campus. Here is an excerpt: Computer modeling of the gravitational lens by Keeton and Eid showed that the four visible foreground galaxies causing the gravitational bending couldn’t explain the details of the five-image pattern. Only with the addition of a large, invisible mass, in this case, a dark matter halo, could the model match the observations...
Hi, I’m pretty new to cosmology and I’m trying to get my head around the Big Bang and the potential infinite extent of the universe as a whole. There’s lots of misleading info out there but this forum and a few others have helped me and I just wanted to check I have the right idea. The Big Bang was the creation of space and time. At this instant t=0 space was infinite in size but the scale factor was zero. I’m picturing it (hopefully correctly) like an excel spreadsheet with infinite...
Back
Top