What does one calorie per cubic mile mean to you?

  • Thread starter Thread starter marcus
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Cubic Mean Per
AI Thread Summary
One calorie per cubic mile is equivalent to approximately one joule per cubic kilometer, highlighting the energy density of the universe measured at 0.85 joules per cubic kilometer. This density contributes to the universe's flatness and supports the observed acceleration of its expansion. In terms of sunlight, there are about 5000 calories per cubic mile at Earth's distance from the sun, significantly higher than the overall energy density of the universe. This energy density is crucial for defining the "habitable zone" around stars, where conditions are suitable for life. Understanding these energy densities helps explain phenomena like the darkness of the night sky due to insufficient energy per unit volume.
marcus
Science Advisor
Homework Helper
Gold Member
Dearly Missed
Messages
24,753
Reaction score
794
One calorie per cubic mile is almost exactly the same as one joule per cubic kilometer.

Because a calorie is 4.185 joules and a cubic mile is 4.166 cubic km.

And the density of the universe has finally been measured to the general satisfaction of astronomers, at 0.85 joule per cubic kilometer.
This is what makes it flat, and matches the observed acceleration of expansion and the observed bumpiness of the CMB.

As a rough size 0.85 is about one. And so roughly speaking the density of the universe is ONE joule per cubic km.

And in old-timey units (for people who can think in calories and miles) that is about one calorie per cubic mile. Actually 0.85 but about.

Tonight there will no doubt be some people on this planet who look up at the dark and think "hmmm, on average there is about a calorie in a cubic mile of that"
 
Astronomy news on Phys.org
the energy density of sunlight at this distance

at this distance from the sun and at anyone instant how many joules of sunlight does a cubic kilometer of space contain?

or how many calories of sunlight are in a cubic mile since it is the same number

and does it matter, should we care? well it is what makes this zone that the Earth orbits in the "habitable zone"
exobiologists are not averse to talking about the "habitable zone" around each star which in effect is the zone where space
has this energy density of light

I think there are around 5000 calories of sunlight per cubic mile
in space at this distance----or joules per cubic km

Order of magnitude, it is around 5000 times the overall energy density of the universe.

The present energy density 0.85 joule/km^3 overall is one of the things that makes the universe hospitable to life----flat, given its present expansion rate etc---not about to collapse on itself. So two kinds of habitability both of which can be expressed as energy densities---one being a few thousand times the other.

no time to proofread, hope no gross errors
 


Originally posted by marcus
I think there are around 5000 calories of sunlight per cubic mile
in space at this distance----or joules per cubic km

Order of magnitude, it is around 5000 times the overall energy density of the universe.

You've come across another way of explaining why the sky is dark at night: there's just not enough energy out there (per unit volume one must be careful to note) to make it bright.
 
Complete vacuum...:wink:
 
What does one calorie per cubic mile mean to you?
It means a lot more more exercise then I feel like doing if I'm going to 'lose' that sandwich I had for lunch today.
 
TL;DR Summary: In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect alien signals, it will further expand the radius of the so-called silence (or rather, radio silence) of the Universe. Is there any sense in this or is blissful ignorance better? In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect...
Thread 'Could gamma-ray bursts have an intragalactic origin?'
This is indirectly evidenced by a map of the distribution of gamma-ray bursts in the night sky, made in the form of an elongated globe. And also the weakening of gamma radiation by the disk and the center of the Milky Way, which leads to anisotropy in the possibilities of observing gamma-ray bursts. My line of reasoning is as follows: 1. Gamma radiation should be absorbed to some extent by dust and other components of the interstellar medium. As a result, with an extragalactic origin, fewer...
Both have short pulses of emission and a wide spectral bandwidth, covering a wide variety of frequencies: "Fast Radio Bursts (FRBs) are detected over a wide range of radio frequencies, including frequencies around 1400 MHz, but have also been detected at lower frequencies, particularly in the 400–800 MHz range. Russian astronomers recently detected a powerful burst at 111 MHz, expanding our understanding of the FRB range. Frequency Ranges: 1400 MHz: Many of the known FRBs have been detected...
Back
Top