What Does Support a Column of Mercury Mean at Sea Level?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on understanding the concept of "support" in relation to atmospheric pressure and a column of mercury at sea level. It clarifies that atmospheric pressure can support a mercury column of 760 mm due to the force exerted by air pressure, which is independent of the cross-sectional area of the tube. The calculations provided demonstrate how to derive atmospheric pressure in hPa from the height of the mercury column using the formula P = ρgh. Participants express confusion about proving the relationship between atmospheric pressure and the height of mercury, emphasizing the minimal effect of vapor pressure in this context. The conversation concludes with acknowledgment of the temperature dependence of vapor pressure, which is considered negligible.
Andrusko
Messages
42
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



At sea level, the pressure of the standard terrestrial atmosphere will support a column of mercury of density 1.359 x 10^4 kg/m^3 and of height 0.7600m at a place where the acceleration due to gravity is 9.80665 m/s^2. Show that 1 atmosphere = 760 mm Hg = 1013hPa.

I really just want to know what "support" means.

Does it mean that at this pressure the mercury can only expand so far? So if you had a 1m long tube and you put the mercury in it it would rise 0.76m up the tube. Is it the case that the expansion of the mercury is independent of its area?

If you had a receptacle of cross sectional area A and one of cross sectional area B and you put the same amount of mercury into both would they rise the same distance? Because this doesn't seem right at all.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Andrusko said:

Homework Statement



At sea level, the pressure of the standard terrestrial atmosphere will support a column of mercury of density 1.359 x 10^4 kg/m^3 and of height 0.7600m at a place where the acceleration due to gravity is 9.80665 m/s^2. Show that 1 atmosphere = 760 mm Hg = 1013hPa.

I really just want to know what "support" means.

Does it mean that at this pressure the mercury can only expand so far? So if you had a 1m long tube and you put the mercury in it it would rise 0.76m up the tube. Is it the case that the expansion of the mercury is independent of its area?

If you had a receptacle of cross sectional area A and one of cross sectional area B and you put the same amount of mercury into both would they rise the same distance? Because this doesn't seem right at all.
There is a picture at this link that should help you understand what support means:
http://www.idahoop.org/education/lesson8b.htm

It means the air pushing toward the vacuum can only push 760 mm of Hg.
 
Thanks, that's cleared most of the problem up but I'm still having issues.

By definition atmospheric pressure can be measured in mm/Hg by how far up a tube mercury is pushed by it. The question specifies that the mercury is pushed up 760mm. How does one go about mathematically proving that? Or do I just state exactly what I've said? I got my answer in hPa like so:

I set the zero point to be the mercury-air interface and did a calculation with this formula:

P = P_{0} + \rho(y_{0}-y_{1})g

P_{0} = 0.76*\rho*g

where P_{0} is atmospheric pressure. and P is the vacuum at the top of the tube, and thus zero. After calculating, I get

P_{0} = 101287 Pa which when divided by 100 to get it in hPa is 1013 hPa. Fair enough, but how can I prove the mm/Hg bit?
 
Andrusko said:
Thanks, that's cleared most of the problem up but I'm still having issues.

By definition atmospheric pressure can be measured in mm/Hg by how far up a tube mercury is pushed by it. The question specifies that the mercury is pushed up 760mm. How does one go about mathematically proving that? Or do I just state exactly what I've said? I got my answer in hPa like so:

I set the zero point to be the mercury-air interface and did a calculation with this formula:

P = P_{0} + \rho(y_{0}-y_{1})g

P_{0} = 0.76*\rho*g

where P_{0} is atmospheric pressure. and P is the vacuum at the top of the tube, and thus zero. After calculating, I get

P_{0} = 101287 Pa which when divided by 100 to get it in hPa is 1013 hPa. Fair enough, but how can I prove the mm/Hg bit?

I'm at a loss to say it any other way than that there is minimal vapor pressure in the near vacuum, .01mm or something like that, and it offers little additional offset to help the mercury on the one side to the weight of the air on the other. So ...

P_{0} = \rho*g*h

There is a temperature dependence to the vapor pressure, but I think that it is much tinier per degree C.
 
Fair enough, that makes sense.

Thanks for the help, LowlyPion.
 
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Back
Top