B What does this mysterious formula found in a financial institution mean?

  • B
  • Thread starter Thread starter DaveC426913
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Formula Random
DaveC426913
Gold Member
Messages
23,830
Reaction score
7,814
Found this formula on a whiteboard. I work in a financial institution.
Can this mean something?
form.png

(I may have transcribed the handwriting poorly. The d's might be a's.)
 

Attachments

  • form.png
    form.png
    2.5 KB · Views: 642
Last edited:
Mathematics news on Phys.org
DaveC426913 said:
Found this formula on a whiteboard. I work in a financial institution.
Can this mean something?
View attachment 239827
(I may have transcribed the handwriting poorly. The d's might be a's.)

It's got something to do with your future raise. :-) If you don't get it then you'll know why.
 
  • Like
Likes DaveC426913
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
I'm interested to know whether the equation $$1 = 2 - \frac{1}{2 - \frac{1}{2 - \cdots}}$$ is true or not. It can be shown easily that if the continued fraction converges, it cannot converge to anything else than 1. It seems that if the continued fraction converges, the convergence is very slow. The apparent slowness of the convergence makes it difficult to estimate the presence of true convergence numerically. At the moment I don't know whether this converges or not.
Back
Top