What Does Wave Rating Mean in Telescope Mirrors?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Artman
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Mirrors Wave
AI Thread Summary
Wave rating in telescope mirrors refers to the precision of the mirror's shape, specifically how closely it approximates an ideal parabolic figure, measured in fractions of a wavelength of light. A "quarter-wave" mirror means its surface deviations are within one-quarter of the wavelength of green light, translating to less than 100 nanometers from the ideal shape. The discussion highlights that while wave ratings are important, they can be misleading; the Strehl Ratio is often considered a more reliable indicator of a mirror's optical quality. Accurate measurements in green light are emphasized, as other wavelengths may not reflect true performance. Understanding these metrics is crucial for evaluating telescope mirror quality.
Artman
Messages
1,506
Reaction score
40
I know that a telescope system is supposed to be at least 1/4 wave or less (for both primary and secondary ratings combined), but I am not quite sure what the wave rating refers to. Can someone explain what this is measuring.
 
Astronomy news on Phys.org
A "quarter-wave" mirror is a mirror whose figure is an accurate parabola within one quarter wavelength of a specific color of visible light (green, I believe). In other words, the hills and valleys on the mirror's surface are smaller than about 100 nanometers from the ideal parabolic figure.

- Warren
 
Thanks chroot,
I thought it was something like that, but I have never seen it defined.
 
As chroot said, the measure is usualy in green light, most sensitive to the eye and at a wavelength short enough to be meaningful. A 1/25th wave mirror measured in red light would most likely be a terrible figure for a telescope mirror.

Actually, most wavelength claims are being ignored in favor of an accurate measure of the "Strehl Ratio", which is much more indicative of a mirror's surface accuracy.

See:
http://www.rfroyce.com/standards.htm

Labguy
 
TL;DR Summary: In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect alien signals, it will further expand the radius of the so-called silence (or rather, radio silence) of the Universe. Is there any sense in this or is blissful ignorance better? In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect...
Thread 'Could gamma-ray bursts have an intragalactic origin?'
This is indirectly evidenced by a map of the distribution of gamma-ray bursts in the night sky, made in the form of an elongated globe. And also the weakening of gamma radiation by the disk and the center of the Milky Way, which leads to anisotropy in the possibilities of observing gamma-ray bursts. My line of reasoning is as follows: 1. Gamma radiation should be absorbed to some extent by dust and other components of the interstellar medium. As a result, with an extragalactic origin, fewer...
This thread is dedicated to the beauty and awesomeness of our Universe. If you feel like it, please share video clips and photos (or nice animations) of space and objects in space in this thread. Your posts, clips and photos may by all means include scientific information; that does not make it less beautiful to me (n.b. the posts must of course comply with the PF guidelines, i.e. regarding science, only mainstream science is allowed, fringe/pseudoscience is not allowed). n.b. I start this...

Similar threads

Back
Top