What does [x] means in mathematics ?

  • Thread starter Thread starter momentum
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Mathematics Means
AI Thread Summary
In mathematics, the notation [x] is often interpreted as "the greatest integer less than or equal to x," commonly known as the floor function. The examples given, [3]=3, [1.5]=1, and [3.5]=3, are correct, but [−1.5] should actually be -2, as it represents the greatest integer less than or equal to -1.5. The discussion highlights that while this interpretation is common, the meaning of the notation can vary depending on the context or source material. It emphasizes the importance of checking definitions in specific texts, as notation can lead to confusion if not clearly defined. Ultimately, the context in which symbols are used is crucial for understanding their intended meaning.
momentum
Messages
111
Reaction score
0
what does [x] means in mathematics ?

i have found [x]= "the greatest integer <=x "

is this true ?

then, what will be the answer of of ...
[3],[1.5],[-1.5],[3.5]




i am trying to answer, please correct me

[3]=3
[1.5]=1
[-1.5]=-1
[3.5]=3

are these correct ?
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
[] meaning greatest integer is a common use of the [], but it can vary.You should check whatever book your problems are from, they should define what they mean by the notation.

If it is the greatest integer function, then "[-1.5]=-1" isn't correct. You want the greatest integer less than or equal to -1.5, so it can't be -1 as -1.5<-1.
 
So, in what way is the defintion for [ x ] you've given different from \lfloor x \rfloor ? - also given to be the symbol for the floor function, which matches the definition you gave.

None, AFAIK, just a "who's the author" thing.

IMO, it's just a bad nomen confusum problem. I've also seen it used in characteristic functions. Somebody ought to pick one use, and pitch the rest... :) and penalize deviating authors 10 points for misuse. :)
 
Rubbish, Jim: there are far too few symbols possible and far too meanings that need to be conveyed. Context makes it clear what is going on.
 
Uniqe and fossilized use of symbols is counter-productive of developing flexibility of the mind. It is the definition AT HAND that matters, and if the chosen notation is convenient for its purpose.
 
Thread 'Video on imaginary numbers and some queries'
Hi, I was watching the following video. I found some points confusing. Could you please help me to understand the gaps? Thanks, in advance! Question 1: Around 4:22, the video says the following. So for those mathematicians, negative numbers didn't exist. You could subtract, that is find the difference between two positive quantities, but you couldn't have a negative answer or negative coefficients. Mathematicians were so averse to negative numbers that there was no single quadratic...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Thread 'Unit Circle Double Angle Derivations'
Here I made a terrible mistake of assuming this to be an equilateral triangle and set 2sinx=1 => x=pi/6. Although this did derive the double angle formulas it also led into a terrible mess trying to find all the combinations of sides. I must have been tired and just assumed 6x=180 and 2sinx=1. By that time, I was so mindset that I nearly scolded a person for even saying 90-x. I wonder if this is a case of biased observation that seeks to dis credit me like Jesus of Nazareth since in reality...

Similar threads

Back
Top