What Experimental Evidence Demonstrates Energy Quantization in Atoms?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the concept of energy quantization in atoms, specifically regarding the experimental evidence that supports this idea. The key point is that emission and absorption lines in atomic spectra serve as evidence for quantization, indicating that atoms can only emit or absorb specific amounts of energy. The mention of Bohr's model highlights the historical context in which these concepts were developed, linking quantization to the formation of spectral lines. The confusion expressed by participants revolves around the definition of "experimental evidence" and its application to the topic. Ultimately, the consensus is that the observed spectral lines are clear indicators of energy quantization in atomic processes.
greg153
Messages
7
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


What experimental evidence requires that the emission of energy by an atom be quantized?


The Attempt at a Solution


I can completely confused on what the question is asking.
What do they mean by "experimental evidence"? Do I talk about Bohr and how he proposed that to get spectral lines, the energy of the election in the atom must be quantized. Would that be "experimental evidence" that the question refers to? or do I just state that emission and absorption lines in atomic spectra are evidence of quantization?

Any help would be appreciated since I am really stumped on this question.

Thanks.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
greg153 said:
do I just state that emission and absorption lines in atomic spectra are evidence of quantization?

Yes. This is an experimental result, that shows that only some amounts of energy can be emited or absorbed, not any amount.
 
Thread 'Confusion regarding a chemical kinetics problem'
TL;DR Summary: cannot find out error in solution proposed. [![question with rate laws][1]][1] Now the rate law for the reaction (i.e reaction rate) can be written as: $$ R= k[N_2O_5] $$ my main question is, WHAT is this reaction equal to? what I mean here is, whether $$k[N_2O_5]= -d[N_2O_5]/dt$$ or is it $$k[N_2O_5]= -1/2 \frac{d}{dt} [N_2O_5] $$ ? The latter seems to be more apt, as the reaction rate must be -1/2 (disappearance rate of N2O5), which adheres to the stoichiometry of the...
I don't get how to argue it. i can prove: evolution is the ability to adapt, whether it's progression or regression from some point of view, so if evolution is not constant then animal generations couldn`t stay alive for a big amount of time because when climate is changing this generations die. but they dont. so evolution is constant. but its not an argument, right? how to fing arguments when i only prove it.. analytically, i guess it called that (this is indirectly related to biology, im...
Back
Top