What Explains the Non-Linear Tone Changes in My Crystal Radio Experiment?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the behavior of magnetic fields and their non-linear tone changes in a crystal radio experiment. It explains that magnetic fields do weaken with distance, but not in a perfectly linear manner, as demonstrated by the inverse square law and the cylindrical symmetry of fields around current-carrying wires. The lines of force depicted in diagrams are symbolic, representing field strength rather than actual measurable gaps. The non-linear tone changes experienced in the crystal radio setup may relate to specific distances where the electromagnetic field interacts with the circuit or the human body. Overall, the conversation highlights the complexities of measuring and understanding electromagnetic fields in practical applications.
YADA
Messages
8
Reaction score
0
Does the strength of a magnetic field become weaker at a constant rate the further you get away from it? I ask this question for two reasons.

1 - When iron filings are placed on a piece of paper and and a magnet is placed under it, there are definite lines of magnetic force visible that become less obvious the further they are away from the magnet.

2 - When I was into electronics, I built a crystal radio and attached a single transistor amplifier to it. I then removed the tuning coil and replaced it with a single piece of wire and replaced the tuning capacitor with one of a fixed value (I can't remember what value). I noticed that as my hand moved close to the circuit a tone was generated in the ear piece that changed in a non-linear fashion. There would be a tone, then silence, a different tone, then more silence as my hand moved closer or further from the circuit. It also worked with electrical wiring behind a wall, whether or not the wire was part of an active circuit.

So, are the lines of force you see in diagrams of magnetic fields actual, measurable, lines of force with 'gaps' of lesser strength between them? What about gravitational fields and electromagnetic fields?

I've tried researching it on the net, but I'm definitely not up with the technical aspects!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Any kind of field, electric, magnetic or gravitational, would fall off linearly with distance only if you had a geometry where it falls off in the same way the circumference of a circle increases with radius. Therefore, if you consider the magnetic field generated by a long, straight current-carrying wire, you have cylindrical symmetry in the magnetic field around it, so expect the expression for magnetic field at some point in space to have a (2 pi r) in the denominator. For magnets of irregular shape, the relationship may or may not be approximately linear, but never perfectly linear.
 
Take a look at the inverse square law, that may help.
 
There are no real gaps between the lines on a diagram. The symbolism is that the lines being closer together, that is, drawing more lines per unit of area on the diagram, represents the field having a greater magnitude. Therefore lines are close together at the poles of a magnet, and further apart at some distance away.

The historical curiosity is that Michael Faraday was poor at mathematics, so he invented diagrams with lines to represent electrical and magnetic fields without having to describe them with equations. Maxwell later have Faraday's discoveries mathematical expression.
 
Fields are measurable, and they do decay in a characteristic "dipole" fashion. The field lines are just a graphing tool, useful for plotting a field on a piece of paper.
 
Thanks very much for the responses. I read about the Inverse Square Law and Maxwell's 'update' of Faraday. So the magnetic field just gets weaker the further it gets from the magnet.

What about my point two? The tone generated wasn't a tone that went from weak to strong or high pitched to low pitched in one go. I noticed that at a certain dstance from my skin, it would give a certain tone, at other distances there would be no tone. The tones were repeatable for the distances; ie. at 15 cm there would be a certain tone. If I moved it away and then back to 15 cm, I would get the same tone. The same thing occurred with the electrical wire.

Any ideas on what was being measured or picked up?
 
comparing a flat solar panel of area 2π r² and a hemisphere of the same area, the hemispherical solar panel would only occupy the area π r² of while the flat panel would occupy an entire 2π r² of land. wouldn't the hemispherical version have the same area of panel exposed to the sun, occupy less land space and can therefore increase the number of panels one land can have fitted? this would increase the power output proportionally as well. when I searched it up I wasn't satisfied with...
Back
Top