What Ground-State Beta Decays Are Possible for Isobaric Mass Chain A=141?

  • Thread starter Thread starter cmyers152
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Beta Nuclear decay
cmyers152
Messages
19
Reaction score
4

Homework Statement


Consider the isobaric mass chain A=141. Using the NNDC website, determine what types of ground-state beta decays are possible for different elements within this chain (beta minus, beta plus, EC, etc.) as well as the nature (allowed, first-forbidden, etc.)

Homework Equations


https://www.nndc.bnl.gov/

The Attempt at a Solution


I have no idea how to even start this and its due at 9am
 
Physics news on Phys.org
What does the website tell you about A=141 nuclei? What are their masses?
The possibility of beta decay modes is just a matter of conservation of energy. If the decay products have less total mass it is possible, otherwise it is not.

The world has many time zones, by the way.
 
thanks for the sass and not helping...
 
I would expect my questions to be very useful as guideline how to find the answer.
 
mfb said:
I would expect my questions to be very useful as guideline how to find the answer.

Did you not see the "by 9AM" part? Harrumph! :rolleyes:

CMyers, one other hint to keep in mind is that A=141 has an odd number of nucleons. That will give you a different answer than if it had an even number.
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top