What Happened to Potential Energy in E=m[tex]c^2[tex]

AI Thread Summary
Potential energy is not included in the equation E=mc² because this equation primarily accounts for rest energy and kinetic energy of a free particle. When considering a charged particle in a strong electric field, its potential energy becomes significant, necessitating a modified approach. The energy-momentum relation for a particle in a potential field is expressed as (E-V)²=(pc)²+(mc²)², where V represents potential energy. This distinction highlights that rest mass does not encompass kinetic energy. Understanding these relationships is crucial for accurately analyzing energy in systems influenced by external fields.
bhthiang
Messages
8
Reaction score
0
I have been wondering why is potential energy not included in the calculation of total energy E=mc^2?<br /> I know that mc^2includes the rest energy and the kinetic energy. Suppose the particle or object is charged and is moving in a strong electric field, its potential energy will be sdgnificant wouldn't it?<br /> If we have to include the PE, how should we do it?<br /> Thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The energy-momentum relation that you see in a standard general physics textbook is:

E^2=(pc)^2+(mc^2)^2

It is typically advertised as the energy-momentum relation for a *free* particle (so V=0). If memory serves, Goldstein's "Classical Mechanics" treats relativistic mechanics with a potential, via the Lagrangian formalism.
 
Properly,
(E-V)^2=(pc)^2+(mc^2)^2
where V is the potential energy and m, the rest mass, does NOT contain the kinetic energy.
 
Properly,
(E-V)^2=(pc)^2+m^2c^4
where m is the rest mass and V the potential energy
 
The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
Hello everyone, Consider the problem in which a car is told to travel at 30 km/h for L kilometers and then at 60 km/h for another L kilometers. Next, you are asked to determine the average speed. My question is: although we know that the average speed in this case is the harmonic mean of the two speeds, is it also possible to state that the average speed over this 2L-kilometer stretch can be obtained as a weighted average of the two speeds? Best regards, DaTario
Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?
Back
Top