What happens if an acid is added to this buffer?

  • Thread starter Thread starter FredericChopin
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Acid Buffer
AI Thread Summary
Adding tartaric acid (H2T) to the buffer system in grapes increases the concentration of H2T, causing equilibrium (1) to shift and produce more hydrogen tartrate (HT-) and hydrogen ions (H+). This results in a decrease in pH, contrary to the expectation that the buffer would maintain pH stability. The increased HT- concentration leads to equilibrium (2) shifting, resulting in the precipitation of potassium hydrogen tartrate (KHT). However, the overall effect is that the pH still decreases due to the loss of hydroxide ions and the dilution of all species in the solution. Therefore, while buffers resist pH changes, they cannot completely prevent a decrease in pH when strong acids are added.
FredericChopin
Messages
101
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


In grapes, there is an equilibrium between tartaric acid and hydrogen tartrate and hydrogen ions:

(1) H2T (aq) <=> HT- (aq) + H+

NOTE: "T" stands for the tartrate ion C4H4O6.

There is also a buffer system in grapes, involving a solubility equilibrium of potassium hydrogen tartrate and hydrogen tartrate and potassium ions:

(2) K+ (aq) + HT- (aq) <=> KHT (s)

What happens if you add H2T to this system?

Homework Equations


N/A

The Attempt at a Solution


If I added an acid to this system, the buffer will oppose the decrease in pH and so the pH will stay the same, right?

Suppose I added H2T to this system: then I have increased the concentration of H2T, and due to Le Chatelier's Principle, equilibrium (1) will shift to produce more HT- and H+. This will increase the concentration of HT- however, so equilibrium (2) will shift so that K+ reacts with HT- to produce KHT, which will precipitate. But hold on, the concentration of H+ has increased, meaning the pH has gone down. The buffer has not opposed a decrease in pH!

What's going on?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Assuming you managed to prepare solution that behaves the way you describe, you add the acid AND remove the conjugate base at the same time, so it is not as simple as just adding acid to the buffer.

Besides, when you add acid (base) to the buffer pH always goes down (up) - just slower than if the buffer wasn't present.
 
Borek said:
Besides, when you add acid (base) to the buffer pH always goes down (up) - just slower than if the buffer wasn't present.

The reason for this is because while the acid is neutralized, remember that base was used to neutralize it. You lose hydroxide ions from solution and the volume of acid added will decrease the concentration of all entities involved.
 
Thread 'Confusion regarding a chemical kinetics problem'
TL;DR Summary: cannot find out error in solution proposed. [![question with rate laws][1]][1] Now the rate law for the reaction (i.e reaction rate) can be written as: $$ R= k[N_2O_5] $$ my main question is, WHAT is this reaction equal to? what I mean here is, whether $$k[N_2O_5]= -d[N_2O_5]/dt$$ or is it $$k[N_2O_5]= -1/2 \frac{d}{dt} [N_2O_5] $$ ? The latter seems to be more apt, as the reaction rate must be -1/2 (disappearance rate of N2O5), which adheres to the stoichiometry of the...
I don't get how to argue it. i can prove: evolution is the ability to adapt, whether it's progression or regression from some point of view, so if evolution is not constant then animal generations couldn`t stay alive for a big amount of time because when climate is changing this generations die. but they dont. so evolution is constant. but its not an argument, right? how to fing arguments when i only prove it.. analytically, i guess it called that (this is indirectly related to biology, im...
Back
Top