What Happens if CuSO4 is Added Before Connecting the Power in Electroplating?

AI Thread Summary
Adding CuSO4 before connecting the power in electroplating could lead to potential hazards, such as a shock risk if the operator's hands are wet during the process. Typically, copper sulfate solutions are prepared and added only after the power source is connected to ensure safety and effectiveness. Pouring the solution beforehand may disrupt the electroplating process and could lead to a failed experiment. The consensus among experienced electroplaters is to always have the solution ready before applying voltage. Proper procedure is crucial for both safety and successful electroplating outcomes.
ms. confused
Messages
90
Reaction score
0
I have a question about electroplating a metal object with copper.

Since CuSO4 is normally poured in after the power source is connected, what might happen if it is poured in before? Would there be some sort of short-circuit happening or would it just cause the whole experiment to fail?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
well i have never haerd of adding it after. i have eletroplated with copper before and i had a super satrated sultion of copper sulfate i tricked my friend pretty goodwith the mint condistion weate back penny made in 1943 (he was vary goleble)
 
kclo4x said:
well i have never haerd of adding it after. i have eletroplated with copper before and i had a super satrated sultion of copper sulfate i tricked my friend pretty goodwith the mint condistion weate back penny made in 1943 (he was vary goleble)

I agree. Won't pouring it AFTER the voltage is applied create a shock hazard? You know, if your fingers are wet, and you touch the liquid as you're pouring it, the voltage will run UP the flow and into your hands. And also, I've plated a bunch of time in College. The solutions were always ready to go when the voltage was applied.
 
Last edited:
saltydog said:
The solutions were always ready to go when the voltage was applied.
Second (third ?) that.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top