What Happens to Current in an Ideal Circuit with Zero Resistance?

  • Thread starter Thread starter swap1996
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Circuit Current
AI Thread Summary
In an ideal circuit with zero resistance, connecting an ideal battery leads to the conclusion of infinite current, which is deemed a meaningless scenario. The voltage at the terminals of the battery remains defined, but the current becomes undefined due to the lack of resistance. The discussion highlights that while the situation is theoretically interesting, it does not align with physical reality. Kirchhoff's voltage law cannot be applied in this context because the premise is considered nonsensical. Ultimately, the thread was closed due to the flawed premise of the question.
swap1996
Messages
10
Reaction score
0
If an ideal battery of zero internal resistance is connected to a conductor having no resistance, what should be the current through the circuit (as in schematic) ?
 

Attachments

  • current.jpg
    current.jpg
    5.8 KB · Views: 414
Physics news on Phys.org
swap1996 said:
If an ideal battery of zero internal resistance is connected to a conductor having no resistance, what should be the current through the circuit (as in schematic) ?

The question is meaningless, really. It would be infinite current, but so what? It is not a physical situation.
 
The ideal voltage source defines the voltage at its terminals to be V. If the conductor connecting its terminals has zero resistance, the voltage between its ends is zero.

I would say, if V is nonzero, the current through the voltage source is undefined.
 
berkeman said:
The question is meaningless, really. It would be infinite current, but so what? It is not a physical situation.

No doubt its not a physical situation but at least it is a proper theoretical case which can be considered from a theoretical point of view....in that case I have some questions...how can Kirchhoff's voltage law be applied to this circuit...
 
swap1996 said:
No doubt its not a physical situation but at least it is a proper theoretical case which can be considered from a theoretical point of view....in that case I have some questions...how can Kirchhoff's voltage law be applied to this circuit...

It cannot, because the premise is nonsense. We do not waste people's time here at the PF with threads that start with a false premise. Thread is closed.
 
Thread 'Motional EMF in Faraday disc, co-rotating magnet axial mean flux'

Thread 'Motional EMF in Faraday disc, co-rotating magnet axial mean flux'

So here is the motional EMF formula. Now I understand the standard Faraday paradox that an axis symmetric field source (like a speaker motor ring magnet) has a magnetic field that is frame invariant under rotation around axis of symmetry. The field is static whether you rotate the magnet or not. So far so good. What puzzles me is this , there is a term average magnetic flux or "azimuthal mean" , this term describes the average magnetic field through the area swept by the rotating Faraday...
View full post »

Similar threads

I Can current flow in an open circuit?
Replies
4
Views
3K
I Does current decrease inside a wire or does it increase it's velocity?
Replies
8
Views
2K
Whether charges can stay inside wires or on the surface of a conductor
Replies
1
Views
933
2 charged conductors form a capacitor
Replies
15
Views
1K
I Resistance and specific resistance relationships
Replies
16
Views
2K
Basic question about current in an electric circuit
Replies
12
Views
3K
Voltage drop in the internal resistance of a voltage source
Replies
9
Views
3K
I Is the Poynting Vector Field the Only Factor in Energy Flow in Circuits?
Replies
16
Views
3K
!Measuring Currents in a Circuit w/ Semiconductor
Replies
3
Views
1K
I An attempt to understand the associated variable conventions in circuits
Replies
1
Views
2K

Hot Threads

Recent Insights

Back
Top