What Happens to Op-Amp Gain When Switch is On?

AI Thread Summary
In a non-inverting Op-Amp circuit, the gain is initially calculated as A = 1 + (R1 + R2)/R3 when the switch is off. When the switch is turned on, it shorts R2, leading to a new gain of A = 1 + (R1)/R3. The discussion highlights the importance of proper circuit diagram conventions, such as using junction points to indicate connections. The circuit's functionality is compromised when the switch is open due to a lack of negative feedback. Overall, understanding the impact of the switch on gain and adhering to schematic conventions is crucial for accurate circuit design.
foobag
Messages
75
Reaction score
0
http://img684.imageshack.us/img684/8362/opamp2.png

Lets say we are given a non-inverting Op-Amp

The gain of this circuit would be A = 1 + (R1+R2)/R3 if the switch is off.

What happens when the switch is turned on? It shorts the R1 and R2 resistors am I correct? Does this mean that R1 and R2 will behave as if they are in parallel, and decrease the overall gain of this amplifier?

Appreciate your help!
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Engineering news on Phys.org
As you have drawn it, only R2 is shorted.

So, the gain is A = 1 + (R1)/R3.
 
ah ok, thank you for your help!
 
As the circuit is drawn it doesn't work (in any sensible way) when the switch is open as there is no negative feedback.

Where two wires cross on a circuit diagram you MUST place a "junction point" (filled in dot) if the two wires are connected at that point. Otherwise there is NO connection. This is the standard convention.
 
Another convention is to draw a hump where there is a crossover that doesn't touch.

Yet another is draw a broken line where it passes under another wire.

All three methods are used but I like the solid circle method as it is unambiguous.

In this case, there is apparently a connection at each side of the resistor with the switch across it.
 
Last edited:
vk6kro said:
Another convention is to draw a hump where there is a crossover that doesn't touch.
Yeah but that is somewhat outdated now. The most common convention (which is used almost universally in circuits and schematic software) is the use of the junction point "dot".

btw UART, where are you in oz? Up very late unless you are in WA?
Yeah I'm just up late.
 
Thread 'Weird near-field phenomenon I get in my EM simulation'
I recently made a basic simulation of wire antennas and I am not sure if the near field in my simulation is modeled correctly. One of the things that worry me is the fact that sometimes I see in my simulation "movements" in the near field that seems to be faster than the speed of wave propagation I defined (the speed of light in the simulation). Specifically I see "nodes" of low amplitude in the E field that are quickly "emitted" from the antenna and then slow down as they approach the far...
Hello dear reader, a brief introduction: Some 4 years ago someone started developing health related issues, apparently due to exposure to RF & ELF related frequencies and/or fields (Magnetic). This is currently becoming known as EHS. (Electromagnetic hypersensitivity is a claimed sensitivity to electromagnetic fields, to which adverse symptoms are attributed.) She experiences a deep burning sensation throughout her entire body, leaving her in pain and exhausted after a pulse has occurred...
Back
Top