What happens to Snell's Law when considering the atomic properties of materials?

  • Thread starter Thread starter eminent_youtom
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Law Snell's law
AI Thread Summary
Snell's Law applies under the continuum hypothesis where atomic properties are not considered, allowing derivation through ray optics and wave mechanics. However, for waves with short wavelengths, atomic properties become significant, necessitating the consideration of scattering processes influenced by the material's atomic lattice. In such cases, Bragg's Law may provide the angles for transmission and reflection. The discussion highlights the limitations of Snell's Law when atomic interactions are relevant. Understanding these principles is crucial for accurately describing light behavior at the atomic scale.
eminent_youtom
Messages
47
Reaction score
0
Violation of Snell's Law??

Let's pass a beam of photon with low intensity towards a smooth surface. If the beam has infinitesimal thickness and passes through the gap of atoms, does it follow Snell's Law?
What are the restriction and limitation of Snell's Law?
your answer will be appreciated.
 
Science news on Phys.org
eminent_youtom said:
Let's pass a beam of photon with low intensity towards a smooth surface. If the beam has infinitesimal thickness and passes through the gap of atoms, does it follow Snell's Law?

First, let us consider the problem in the continuum hypothesis, ie. no atoms. In this case yes; Snells law can be derived using the ray optics model and triangular calculations, but it can also be derived using advanced wave mechanics and electrodymanic boundary conditions, which make no assumptions on the spatial extention of the wave.

In case of a wave of short wavelenght, the atomic properties of the material begins to be important. In this case, you wil have to consider the transmission and reflection as a scattering process from a regular latrice. Here braggs law give you the angels. It is, I suppose, if your latrice is completely regular, possible to make a photon of very short wavelenght travel through a latrice channel without interacting with the electrons.
 
Troels said:
First, let us consider the problem in the continuum hypothesis, ie. no atoms. In this case yes; Snells law can be derived using the ray optics model and triangular calculations, but it can also be derived using advanced wave mechanics and electrodymanic boundary conditions, which make no assumptions on the spatial extention of the wave.

In case of a wave of short wavelenght, the atomic properties of the material begins to be important. In this case, you wil have to consider the transmission and reflection as a scattering process from a regular latrice. .

Thank you for your reply.
Its bit tough for me to understand. what does the atomic properties of the material begins to be important means? and how does snell's law hold on my question?
 
Thread 'A quartet of epi-illumination methods'
Well, it took almost 20 years (!!!), but I finally obtained a set of epi-phase microscope objectives (Zeiss). The principles of epi-phase contrast is nearly identical to transillumination phase contrast, but the phase ring is a 1/8 wave retarder rather than a 1/4 wave retarder (because with epi-illumination, the light passes through the ring twice). This method was popular only for a very short period of time before epi-DIC (differential interference contrast) became widely available. So...
I am currently undertaking a research internship where I am modelling the heating of silicon wafers with a 515 nm femtosecond laser. In order to increase the absorption of the laser into the oxide layer on top of the wafer it was suggested we use gold nanoparticles. I was tasked with modelling the optical properties of a 5nm gold nanoparticle, in particular the absorption cross section, using COMSOL Multiphysics. My model seems to be getting correct values for the absorption coefficient and...
After my surgery this year, gas remained in my eye for a while. The light air bubbles appeared to sink to the bottom, and I realized that the brain was processing the information to invert the up/down/left/right image transferred to the retina. I have a question about optics and ophthalmology. Does the inversion of the image transferred to the retina depend on the position of the intraocular focal point of the lens of the eye? For example, in people with farsightedness, the focal point is...
Back
Top