What happens to the electron neutrino post beta+ decay?

cameljoe11c
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
In β+ decay a proton releases a positron and an electron neutrino causing the proton to change into a neutron to help balance the nucleus. I am studying advanced PET imaging and trying find a better understanding of the positrons other half. Does it just go on being a normal electron.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Welcome to PF;
cameljoe11c said:
In β+ decay a proton releases a positron and an electron neutrino causing the proton to change into a neutron to help balance the nucleus. I am studying advanced PET imaging and trying find a better understanding of the positrons other half. Does it just go on being a normal electron.
By "positron's other half" you mean the electron-neutrino?
You are asking: "Does [an electron neutrino] just go on being a normal electron?"

JIC: A neutrino is not an electron.
Therefore it cannot go on being a normal electron as it was never an electron of any kind whatsoever.
But I'm sure you realized that ;)

Like any particle, a neutrino will continue as itself until it has some sort of interaction.
Neutrinos interact very weakly so they can get a very long way before something happens to them - though neutrinos can decay into each other.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Neutrino#Oscillation
 
Simon Bridge said:
though neutrinos can decay into each other.
I think "decay" is misleading here - oscillation means that those neutrinos can (but do not have to) interact as a different neutrino species (muon neutrino or tau neutrino) afterwards. It is not a permanent transformation as in a decay, and no other particles are emitted.

There is no reasonable way to detect the neutrinos emitted in a PET scan, as interactions of them are extremely rare.
 
Toponium is a hadron which is the bound state of a valance top quark and a valance antitop quark. Oversimplified presentations often state that top quarks don't form hadrons, because they decay to bottom quarks extremely rapidly after they are created, leaving no time to form a hadron. And, the vast majority of the time, this is true. But, the lifetime of a top quark is only an average lifetime. Sometimes it decays faster and sometimes it decays slower. In the highly improbable case that...
I'm following this paper by Kitaev on SL(2,R) representations and I'm having a problem in the normalization of the continuous eigenfunctions (eqs. (67)-(70)), which satisfy \langle f_s | f_{s'} \rangle = \int_{0}^{1} \frac{2}{(1-u)^2} f_s(u)^* f_{s'}(u) \, du. \tag{67} The singular contribution of the integral arises at the endpoint u=1 of the integral, and in the limit u \to 1, the function f_s(u) takes on the form f_s(u) \approx a_s (1-u)^{1/2 + i s} + a_s^* (1-u)^{1/2 - i s}. \tag{70}...
Back
Top