What happens to the intersection of subsets when the class is empty?

  • Thread starter Thread starter samkolb
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Sets
samkolb
Messages
37
Reaction score
0
I'm starting a book on topology and I've come to this come to this confusing statement:

Let A1, A2, ... be subsets of some universal set U.

If the class {A1, A2, ...} is empty, then the intersection of all the Ai is U.


I know that the intersection of empty sets is empty, but I don't quite see how to even think of the intersection of the Ai when {A1, A2, ...} is empty.

Can anyone explain this?
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
What does it mean for a point not to be in the intersection of a class?

Let P be a point. Can you find a set in your class that doesn't contain P?
 
I think I get it now. If P is not in some Ai, then Ai must exist in {A1, A2, ...}, which is empty.

Thanks.
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
I'm interested to know whether the equation $$1 = 2 - \frac{1}{2 - \frac{1}{2 - \cdots}}$$ is true or not. It can be shown easily that if the continued fraction converges, it cannot converge to anything else than 1. It seems that if the continued fraction converges, the convergence is very slow. The apparent slowness of the convergence makes it difficult to estimate the presence of true convergence numerically. At the moment I don't know whether this converges or not.
Back
Top