What Happens to the Wavelength of Light as it Passes Through Water?

AI Thread Summary
When light passes through water, its wavelength changes due to the different refractive index, while its frequency remains constant. Upon exiting the water into a vacuum, the wavelength will revert to its original value, not remaining at 380nm. This phenomenon contrasts with sound, which does not change frequency when transitioning between media. The key concept is that wave speed influences wavelength, but frequency remains unchanged at boundaries. Understanding this relationship is essential in physics education.
The Baron
Messages
23
Reaction score
0
I have a question, say a wave of light is emitted, and it passes through water, changing it's wave length to 380nm inside the water, once it comes out of the water, to vacuum will the wavelength remain at 380nm or will it change?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The wavelength (and speed) changes as the light passes through various media. What remains the same is the frequency.
 
  • Like
Likes sophiecentaur
The Baron said:
once it comes out of the water, to vacuum will the wavelength remain at 380nm or will it change?
I think this must be one of the most frequently asked questions in Physics. Strange - but not so strange is that we all accept the fact that sound doesn't change frequency as it passes through different media. Where's the difference between the two ideas? Imo, it has to be because we started off (and still do, largely) by quantifying light in terms of its wavelength but we hear the frequency of sound.
The clever bit is about a change in wave speed affecting the wavelength and not the frequency is one step further on in our Physics education. Frequency is the fundamental quantity in waves because the vibrations have to be 'continuous' at an interface (the ups and downs cannot get out of step across a boundary). The wavelength is then tied to the frequency by the wave speed.
 
I have recently been really interested in the derivation of Hamiltons Principle. On my research I found that with the term ##m \cdot \frac{d}{dt} (\frac{dr}{dt} \cdot \delta r) = 0## (1) one may derivate ##\delta \int (T - V) dt = 0## (2). The derivation itself I understood quiet good, but what I don't understand is where the equation (1) came from, because in my research it was just given and not derived from anywhere. Does anybody know where (1) comes from or why from it the...
This has been discussed many times on PF, and will likely come up again, so the video might come handy. Previous threads: https://www.physicsforums.com/threads/is-a-treadmill-incline-just-a-marketing-gimmick.937725/ https://www.physicsforums.com/threads/work-done-running-on-an-inclined-treadmill.927825/ https://www.physicsforums.com/threads/how-do-we-calculate-the-energy-we-used-to-do-something.1052162/
Back
Top